...
首页> 外文期刊>Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation >Evaluation of two posture survey instruments for assessing computing postures among college students
【24h】

Evaluation of two posture survey instruments for assessing computing postures among college students

机译:评估两种姿势测量工具的大学生计算姿势的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To determine agreement between two posture assessment survey instruments and which, if any, were correlated with experiencing upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms. Methods: Thirty undergraduate participants had three postural assessment surveys completed, one each for three separate 7-day data collection periods during a semester. Two observation assessment tools were used, a modified Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (mRULA) for computer users for the right and left limbs and the University of California Computer Use Checklist. Concurrently, upper extremity musculoskeletal symptom experience paired to each postural assessment was measured. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient evaluated survey agreement and multi-level statistical models described associations between survey responses and symptoms. Results: There was no agreement between the two postural assessment tool scores (p> 0.85). In adjusted models, the UC Computer Use Checklist was positively associated with symptoms occurrence (OR=1.4, 90% CI 1.2–1.6 for any symptoms; OR=1.3, 90% CI 1.0–1.6 for moderate or greater symptoms). Associations with mRULA scores were inconsistent in that they were sometimes protective and sometimes indicators of risk, depending on the covariates included in the models. Conclusion: The mRULA for computer users and the UC Computer Use Checklist were independent of each other; however, due to the inconsistent associations with symptoms we cannot conclude one instrument is superior to the other. Our data do suggest the UC Computer Use Checklist demonstrates a traditional relationship with symptoms, where increasing scores signifiy greater risk. We observed a nontraditional relatioship with symptoms for the mRULA for computer users that needs to be further examined. This is a pilot study and, thus, findings should be interpreted as exploratory. Associations observed in the current study will be used to test hypotheses in the cohort study recently conducted.
机译:目的:确定两种姿势评估调查工具之间的一致性,以及是否与上肢肌肉骨骼症状相关。方法:30名大学生参加了三个姿势评估调查,每个学期三个学期分别进行了7天的数据收集。使用了两种观察评估工具,一种是针对左右肢的计算机用户的改进的快速上肢评估(mRULA),以及加利福尼亚大学的计算机使用清单。同时,测量与每个姿势评估配对的上肢肌肉骨骼症状经验。林的一致性相关系数评估了调查协议,多级统计模型描述了调查响应与症状之间的关联。结果:两个姿势评估工具得分之间没有一致性(p> 0.85)。在调整后的模型中,UC计算机使用清单与症状的发生呈正相关(OR = 1.4,任何症状为90%CI 1.2-1.6; OR = 1.3,中度或严重症状为90%CI 1.0-1.6)。与mRULA评分相关联的地方不一致,因为它们有时是保护性的,有时是风险的指标,具体取决于模型中包含的协变量。结论:计算机用户的mRULA和UC计算机使用清单相互独立;但是,由于与症状的不一致,我们不能得出结论认为一种仪器优于另一种仪器。我们的数据确实表明UC计算机使用清单证明了与症状的传统关系,分数越高表示风险越大。我们观察到计算机用户的mRULA症状与非传统相关性,需要进一步检查。这是一项试点研究,因此,发现应解释为探索性的。当前研究中观察到的关联将用于检验最近进行的队列研究中的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号