首页> 外文期刊>Women's Writing >“A MERE INSTRUMENT” OR “PROUD AS LUCIFER”? SELF-PRESENTATIONS IN THE OCCULT AUTOBIOGRAPHIES BY EMMA HARDINGE BRITTEN (1900) AND ANNIE BESANT (1893)
【24h】

“A MERE INSTRUMENT” OR “PROUD AS LUCIFER”? SELF-PRESENTATIONS IN THE OCCULT AUTOBIOGRAPHIES BY EMMA HARDINGE BRITTEN (1900) AND ANNIE BESANT (1893)

机译:“仅仅是工具”还是“自豪”?埃玛·哈丁德·布里顿(1900)和安妮·贝桑特(1893)在自传体中的自我表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Occult women writers in the Victorian age were confronted with a double marginalization in patriarchal society, being displaced due to their gender, and thus largely excluded from the production of master discourses, and being marginalized for their spiritual beliefs deviating from institutionalized religions. The strategic discourses that are therefore required to legitimate their textual productions become especially visible in occult women's autobiographical writing. Thus, this article analyses the Autobiography of Emma Hardinge Britten (1900) and Annie Besant's An Autobiography (1893)—texts by the most famous and fervent adherents and propagators of two important strands of Victorian occultism: while Britten was a medium and speaker for spiritualism, Besant became the spokeswoman of theosophy. Read in comparison, these autobiographies generate particular approaches to occultism in the Victorian age, specifically for women. Whereas Britten appears to be passive and modest by her discourse of the instrument for supernatural powers, Besant presents herself as an active agent, employing the discourse of Lucifer. These discursive strategies shed light on the problems and possibilities of occult women's life writing in the nineteenth century, which is uneasily situated between experience and strategies of explaining the “truth”, as well as between exasperated legitimizations and the claim to scientific proof. These discursive attempts at writing occultism are furthermore based on the establishment of a relation to various supernatural or occult “others” who serve the purpose of validating personal authority.
机译:维多利亚时代的神秘主义女作家在父权制社会中面临双重边缘化,由于性别而流离失所,因此很大程度上被排除在主流话语的创作之外,并且由于其背离制度化宗教的精神信仰而被边缘化。因此,使神秘文本的创作合法化所需的战略性话语在神秘女性的自传体写作中尤为明显。因此,本文分析了艾玛·哈丁格·布里顿的自传(1900)和安妮·贝桑特的《自传》(1893)—维多利亚时代神秘主义的两个重要方面的最著名和热心的拥护者和传播者的文字:而布里顿是唯心论的媒介和演讲者,贝桑特成为神学的代言人。相比之下,这些自传在维多利亚时代特别针对女性产生了神秘主义的特殊方法。布里顿在她对超自然力量的仪器的论述中显得被动而谦虚,而贝桑特则利用路西法的论述将自己打扮成活跃的代理人。这些话语策略揭示了19世纪神秘女性生活写作的问题和可能性,这在经验和解释“真相”的策略之间,以及在激怒的合法化和要求科学证明之间,都处于不安的境地。这些写神秘主义的话语尝试还基于与各种超自然或神秘的“他人”的关系的建立,这些“他人”用于验证个人权威。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号