首页> 外文期刊>Women's Writing >a??I CALL BEAUTY A SOCIAL QUALITYa??: MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT AND HANNAH MORE'S REJOINDER TO EDMUND BURKE'S BODY POLITIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL
【24h】

a??I CALL BEAUTY A SOCIAL QUALITYa??: MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT AND HANNAH MORE'S REJOINDER TO EDMUND BURKE'S BODY POLITIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL

机译:我称赞自己具有社会品质a:玛丽·沃尔斯顿(Mary Wollstonecraft)和汉娜·莫尔(HANNAH MORE)共同拥护伯克关于美丽的身体政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers Mary Wollstonecraft's and Hannah More's responses to Edmund Burke's theory of beauty. In his influential aesthetic treatise A Philosophic Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757), Burke argued that beauty elicits the feelings of love that are the foundation of society; he also asserted that women are more beautiful than men. If Burke's aesthetic theory made women's beauty instrumental to the body politic, Wollstonecraft and More questioned whether the fair sex or society really benefited from the valorization of the exterior of women's bodies. In Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790), A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), and More's Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education (1799), both women writers pointed out the antisocial consequences of the fetishizing of women's beauty. Despite the similarity of their criticisms of Burke's aesthetics, they used their critiques to advance radically different visions of women's place in society. While much scholarly attention has focused on Wollstonecraft's and More's politics or theories of education, this article points out how aesthetics were central to their critiques of the social order.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09699082.2011.577296
机译:本文考虑了玛丽·沃尔斯通克拉夫特(Mary Wollstonecraft)和汉娜·莫尔(Hannah More)对埃德蒙·伯克的美容理论的回应。伯克(Burke)在其极富影响力的美学专着《对我们崇高与美丽观念的起源的哲学研究》(1757)中指出,美丽引发了作为社会基础的爱情。他还断言,女人比男人美丽。如果伯克的美学理论使女性的美丽对身体政治起了推动作用,Wollstonecraft和More质疑公平的性别或社会是否真正从女性身体的外部价值中受益。在沃斯通克拉夫特的《对男人的权利的辩护》(1790年),《对女人的权利的辩护》(1792年)和《现代女性教育体系的莫尔的严密法》(1799年)中,两位女作家都指出,迷恋女性主义对社会产生了反社会的影响。女人的美丽。尽管他们对伯克美学的批评相似,但他们还是用批评来提出对妇女在社会中地位的不同看法。尽管学术界的注意力主要集中在沃尔斯通克拉夫特和沃尔德的政治或教育理论上,但本文指出了美学是如何对其社会秩序进行批判的。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09699082.2011.577296

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号