...
首页> 外文期刊>Wind & structures >Ridge and field tile aerodynamics for a low-rise building: a full-scale study
【24h】

Ridge and field tile aerodynamics for a low-rise building: a full-scale study

机译:一栋低层建筑的脊线和田间空气动力学:一项全面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent major post-hurricane damage assessments in the United States have reported that the most common damages result from the loss of building roof coverings and subsequent wind driven rain intrusion. In an effort to look further into this problem, this paper presents a full-scale (Wall of Wind --WoW--) investigation of external and underneath wind pressures on roof tiles installed on a low-rise building model with various gable roofs. The optimal dimensions for the low-rise building that was tested with the WOW are 2.74 m (9 ft) long, 2.13 m (7 ft) wide, and 2.13 m (7 ft) high. The building is tested with interchangeable gable roofs at three different slopes (2:12; 5:12 and 7:12). The field tiles of these gable roofs are considered with three different tile profiles namely high (HP), medium (MP), and low profiles (LP) in accordance with Florida practice. For the ridge, two different types namely rounded and three-sided tiles were considered. The effect of weather block on the "underneath" pressure that develops between the tiles and the roof deck was also examined. These tests revealed the following: high pressure coefficients for the ridge tile compared to the field tiles, including those located at the corners; considerably higher pressure on the gable end ridge tiles compared to ridge tiles at the middle of the ridge line; and marginally higher pressure on barrel type tiles compared to the three-sided ridge tiles. The weather blocking of clay tiles, while useful in preventing water intrusion, it doesn't have significant effect on the wind loads of the field tiles. The case with weather blocking produces positive mean underneath pressure on the field tiles on the windward side thus reducing the net pressures on the windward surface of the roof. On the leeward side, reductions in net pressure to a non-significant level were observed due to the opposite direction of the internal and external pressures. The effect of the weather blocking on the external pressure on the ridge tile was negligible.
机译:美国最近的重大飓风后破坏评估报告指出,最常见的破坏是由于建筑物屋顶覆盖物的丢失以及随后的风驱动雨水入侵造成的。为了进一步研究这个问题,本文对安装在具有各种山墙屋顶的低层建筑模型上的屋面瓦的外部和下方风压进行了全面(风墙-哇)研究。使用WOW进行测试的低层建筑的最佳尺寸为2.74 m(9英尺)长,2.13 m(7英尺)宽和2.13 m(7英尺)高。该建筑在三个不同的坡度(2:12; 5:12和7:12)上使用可互换的山墙屋顶进行了测试。根据佛罗里达州的实践,这些山墙屋顶的野外瓷砖被认为具有三种不同的瓷砖轮廓,即高(HP),中(MP)和低轮廓(LP)。对于山脊,考虑了两种不同的类型,即圆形和三面砖。还检查了挡风雨对瓷砖和屋顶甲板之间产生的“地下”压力的影响。这些测试揭示了以下内容:相比于现场砖(包括位于角落处的砖),屋脊砖的高压系数更高;与山脊线中间的山脊砖相比,山墙末端山脊砖上的压力要高得多;与三面脊形瓷砖相比,桶形瓷砖的压力略高。粘土砖的防风雨性虽然有助于防止水侵入,但对田间砖的风荷载没有显着影响。具有挡风雨的情况在迎风侧的田间地砖上产生正的平均底压力,从而降低了屋顶迎风表面上的净压力。在背风侧,由于内部和外部压力的相反方向,净压力降低到不明显的水平。天气对脊瓦外部压力的影响可以忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号