首页> 外文期刊>The wilson journal of ornithology >INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION COVER ON NEST CAVITY SELECTION AND NESTING SUCCESS OF WHITE-RUMPED SHAMAS (COPSYCHUS MALABARICUS): AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST
【24h】

INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION COVER ON NEST CAVITY SELECTION AND NESTING SUCCESS OF WHITE-RUMPED SHAMAS (COPSYCHUS MALABARICUS): AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST

机译:植被覆盖对白皱沙马(COPSYCHUS MALABARICUS)巢腔选择和巢穴成功的影响:一项实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is often assumed that passerine birds conceal nests to reduce predation because nest predation is usually the primary cause of reproductive failure. We hypothesized that nesting success would be higher in nest cavities with more concealed entrances and therefore more likely chosen over less concealed cavities. We set 200 nest boxes in ~100 territories of White-rumped Shamas (Copsychus malabaricus), territorial cavity nesters, in a seasonal evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand. Shamas were provided two boxes per territory, one with high and the other with low vegetation cover in front of the box entrance. Boxes were reset in new locations after a nest fledged or failed, providing 170 'choice' trials. We also compared vegetation characteristics of natural nest cavities with available natural nest cavities. Contrary to predictions, shamas placed nest material in the less concealed boxes significantly more often (89 boxes vs. 48), were significantly more likely to lay eggs in less concealed boxes (66 vs. 27), and eggs were significantly more likely to hatch in the low concealment treatment (38 vs. 8). Nest survival in the low concealment treatment was approximately twice that of the highly concealed boxes 36% (± 0.035) vs. 18% (± 0.042). Vegetation around natural nests (n = 26) was not significantly different from available randomly selected cavities (n = 52). Both used and available cavities had low levels of concealment. Cavity-nesting species may prefer less concealed sites because it is easier for an incubating/brooding female to detect approaching predators, allowing additional time for escaping and/or for mounting a defense.
机译:人们通常认为雀形目鸟类会掩盖巢以减少捕食,因为巢捕食通常是繁殖失败的主要原因。我们假设在嵌套腔入口更隐蔽的情况下,嵌套成功率更高,因此更有可能选择隐蔽性较小的腔。我们在泰国东北部的一个季节性常绿森林中,在约100个白色腰果(Copsychus malabaricus)(领地巢穴)领土上设置了200个巢箱。每个区域为每个区域提供了两个盒子,一个盒子在盒子入口的前面,一个盒子高,另一个盒子的植被低。巢箱出雏或失败后,盒子会在新的位置重置,提供170次“选择”试验。我们还将自然巢腔的植被特征与可用的自然巢腔进行了比较。与预测相反,Shamas经常将巢状材料放在不太隐蔽的盒子中(89个盒子对48个盒子),显着更有可能在不那么隐蔽的盒子中产卵(66个相对于27个),并且卵子更有可能孵化在低隐蔽治疗中(38比8)。在低隐蔽处理中,巢生存率大约是高隐蔽处理盒中36%(±0.035)对18%(±0.042)的两倍。自然巢周围的植被(n = 26)与可用的随机选择的腔(n = 52)没有显着差异。使用过的和可用的空腔都具有较低的隐蔽性。巢穴物种可能更喜欢隐藏的地方,因为孵化/孵化的雌性更容易发现接近的掠食者,从而有更多的时间逃避和/或进行防御。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The wilson journal of ornithology》 |2017年第4期|727-741|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Conservation Ecology Program King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 49 Soi Tientalay 25, Bangkhuntien-Chaitalay Road, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand;

    Conservation Ecology Program King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 49 Soi Tientalay 25, Bangkhuntien-Chaitalay Road, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand;

    Conservation Ecology Program King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 49 Soi Tientalay 25, Bangkhuntien-Chaitalay Road, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand;

    Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand;

    Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mittraparb Road, Nai-Meuang, Meuang, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand;

    Conservation Ecology Program King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 49 Soi Tientalay 25, Bangkhuntien-Chaitalay Road, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    cavity-nesting; concealment; nest boxes; nest-site selection; nest survival; White-rumped Shama;

    机译:空腔嵌套隐瞒巢箱;巢址选择;巢生存;白腰莎玛;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:42:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号