...
首页> 外文期刊>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment >Use of electric vehicles orrnhydrogen in the Danish transportrnsector in 2050?
【24h】

Use of electric vehicles orrnhydrogen in the Danish transportrnsector in 2050?

机译:到2050年,丹麦交通运输业会使用电动汽车氢氢吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Denmark has an ambitious long-term goal to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG)rnemissions from the transport sector with an overall climate target to be independentrnof fossil-fuel consumption by 2050. We compare a likely scenario withrntwo alternative ways to achieve the goal—either with a high percentage of electricrnvehicles (EV) or with a high percentage of hydrogen use for transportation.rnThe STREAM model—an energy scenario simulating tool—is used to model therndifferent scenarios and their integration with the electricity and heating systems.rnThe major findings are that an increased share of EV can reduce the socioeconomicrncost of the energy system in 2050. However, electricity demand for H2rngeneration via electrolysis is more flexible than EV charging and the productionrncan therefore, to a larger degree be used to out-balance variable electricity surplusrnfrom a high share of wind energy in the power system, reducing the investmentsrnin backup capacity. Whether the hydrogen scenario (H2S) is more costlyrnto implement than the EV scenario (EVS) mainly depends on the technologicalrndevelopment—especially the improvement on the efficiency of the conversionrnfrom electricity to H2 and the cost of the hydrogen fuel cell vehicle. Therefore,rnthe major drivers of a successful H2S are a high efficient flexible H2 productionrnin 2050 and lower vehicle costs, which increase the stability of the power grid,rncompared to the EVS. Hence, from a socioeconomic view point, the technologicalrnpath in innovation to achieve fossil-free transport systems should have vehiclerncosts and electrolyzers efficiency as their main drivers toward 2050.
机译:丹麦有一个雄心勃勃的长期目标,即到2050年减少交通部门的温室气体排放量,总体目标是使化石燃料的消费量独立。我们将可能的情景与实现该目标的两种替代方法进行了比较-要么STREAM模型是一种能源情景模拟工具,用于对不同情景以及它们与电力和供热系统的集成进行建模。rn主要研究结果是,STREAM模型是一种能源情景模拟工具。电动汽车份额的增加可以降低2050年能源系统的社会经济成本。但是,通过电解对氢气发电的电力需求比电动汽车充电更为灵活,因此生产可以更大程度地抵消高额可变电力盈余风能在电力系统中的份额,减少了备用容量的投资。氢情景(H2S)的实施成本是否比EV情景(EVS)的成本高,主要取决于技术的发展,尤其是从电到H2的转换效率以及氢燃料电池汽车成本的提高。因此,成功实现H2S的主要驱动力是2050年高效灵活的H2生产和较低的车辆成本,与EVS相比,这增加了电网的稳定性。因此,从社会经济的角度来看,实现无化石运输系统的创新技术之路应以车辆成本和电解效率为主要动力,直至2050年。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Energy Economics and Regulation, Systems Analysis Division,Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Lyngby, Denmark;

    Energy Economics and Regulation, Systems Analysis Division,Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Lyngby, Denmark;

    Energy Economics and Regulation, Systems Analysis Division,Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Lyngby, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号