...
首页> 外文期刊>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment >Household electricity consumers’ incentive to choose dynamic pricing under different taxation schemes
【24h】

Household electricity consumers’ incentive to choose dynamic pricing under different taxation schemes

机译:家庭用电消费者在不同税制下选择动态定价的动机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dynamic pricing of retail electricity, as opposed to the widely applied averagernpricing, has often been proposed to enhance economic efficiency throughrndemand response. The development of variable production from renewablernenergies and expectations about the installation of heat pumps and electric vehiclesrnhas now reinforced interest in flexible demand and dynamic pricing. With arnroll-out of smart metering one important technical hurdle is going to be cleared,rnand dynamic retail pricing may soon become an eligible option for many households.rnWe quantify the potential incentives to adopt new pricing schemes usingrnexemplary Danish data. Until now, limited activity of household consumers onrnretail markets indicates that switching supplier or contract is perceived costly.rnWe apply the concept of switching costs to explain this hesitant behavior, andrnuse it to estimate a threshold level based on recent observations in the Danishrnmarket. We calculate potential savings from dynamic pricing and show how thernchoice of electricity taxation technique may hamper or enhance potential benefits.rnIn the light of switching costs, our results suggest that the combination ofrnsmart meter roll-out and dynamic pricing offerings might be insufficient to convincernthe majority of households to switch contracts and become active inrnresponse to prices, unless they hold a substantial flexibility potential. Dynamicrntaxation, even if applied to parts of the levies, could contribute significantly torninducing flexible consumption.
机译:与广泛应用的平均定价相反,零售电力的动态定价通常被提出来通过需求响应来提高经济效率。可再生能源的可变生产的发展以及对热泵和电动汽车安装的期望,现在已经使人们对灵活的需求和动态定价产生了兴趣。随着智能电表的推出,一个重要的技术障碍将被清除,动态零售价格可能很快成为许多家庭的合格选择。我们使用丹麦的示例性数据来量化采用新定价方案的潜在动机。到目前为止,家庭消费者在零售市场上的活动有限表明交换供应商或合同的成本很高。我们采用转换成本的概念来解释这种犹豫行为,并根据丹麦市场的最新观察结果来估计阈值水平。我们从动态定价中计算出了潜在的节省,并说明了电税技术的选择如何可能会阻碍或增强潜在的收益。鉴于转换成本,我们的结果表明,智能电表的推出和动态定价产品的结合可能不足以说服大多数人的家庭转换合同并积极应对价格问题,除非他们具有很大的灵活性潜力。即使适用于部分征税,动态税项也可能极大地诱使灵活消费。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment》 |2018年第1期|e270.1-e270.14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Management Engineering, Technical University ofDenmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Dansk Energi, Frederiksberg, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号