首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Research >The fate of dried meat baits laid for fox control: the effects of bait presentation on take by foxes and non-target species, and on caching by foxes
【24h】

The fate of dried meat baits laid for fox control: the effects of bait presentation on take by foxes and non-target species, and on caching by foxes

机译:干肉诱饵的命运决定于狐狸的控制:诱饵展示对狐狸和非目标物种的取食以及对狐狸缓存的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Non-toxic, dried meat baits (45 g) containing small radio-transmitters were laid on cleared sandplots in mixed farming and grain-growing areas in Western Australia. Baits were either buried, tethered by wire trace to a hidden peg, or simply laid untethered on the surface. Baits were exposed for 1 night only and new transects were established each day. Data were available on 1521 baits. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) visited 23% of plots and took baits from 64% of those visited. Unburied baits (both tethered and untethered) were taken significantly more frequently than the buried baits. Of all baits taken by foxes, 25% were cached. Foxes were more likely to cache buried baits than either tethered or untethered baits. Excluding baits taken to cubs, foxes cached baits 3–380 m (mean 87 m) from their original locations. Some baits were carried to cub dens up to 1.25 km away. The fate of 27 cached baits was monitored for varying periods. Of these baits, 59% were later eaten by foxes, most within 3 days. Non-target species took 3% of the baits on offer. Birds were the most common non-target animals to take baits, and in some cases dropped baits up to 400 m away. In terms of takes relative to visits, most takes by birds were of the untethered baits (88%, cf. 33% for tethered, 17% for buried baits). Compared with other baits, a significantly lower proportion of the untethered baits that were taken by birds was actually eaten. Baits cached by foxes and baits moved by birds represent a potential hazard to farm dogs and vulnerable fauna. Recommendations on bait presentation, distance restrictions, and likely risk to farm dogs and non-target species are discussed.
机译:在西澳大利亚州的混合农业和谷物种植区,将含有小型无线电发射器的无毒干肉饵(45克)放在清理过的沙盘上。诱饵要么被掩埋,要么被电线束缚到一个隐藏的钉子上,要么被简单地束缚在表面上。诱饵仅暴露1晚,每天建立新的样条。有1521个诱饵的数据。狐狸(Vulpes vulpes)探访了23%的地块,并从64%的受访者那里获得了诱饵。未埋入的诱饵(栓系和未系留的)比埋入的诱饵被捕的频率要高得多。狐狸捕获的所有诱饵中,有25%被缓存。狐狸比拴系或非拴系诱饵更有可能藏匿掩埋诱饵。除带到幼崽的诱饵外,狐狸从其原始位置缓存了3–380 m(平均87 m)的诱饵。一些诱饵被运到了1.25公里以外的小窝中。监视了27个缓存诱饵的命运,并进行了不同时期的监控。在这些诱饵中,有59%后来被狐狸吃掉了,大部分在3天内。非目标物种获得了3%的诱饵。鸟类是最常见的捕获饵料的非目标动物,在某些情况下,掉落饵料的最大距离为400 m。就探视而言,鸟类的捕获大部分是未系绳的诱饵(88%,比系绳系的33%,掩埋诱饵的17%)。与其他诱饵相比,鸟类食用的解链诱饵的比例实际上要低得多。狐狸存储的饵料和鸟类移动的饵料对农场犬和脆弱的动物群构成潜在危害。讨论了有关诱饵表现,距离限制以及对农场狗和非目标物种可能造成的危险的建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wildlife Research》 |2002年第4期|p.371-377|共7页
  • 作者

    P. C. Thomson and N. E. Kok;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Agriculture, Vertebrate Pest Research Section, Bougainvillea Avenue,Forrestfield, WA 6058, Australia.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号