首页> 外文期刊>Wetlands >HYDROLOGIC REGIME AND MACROPHYTE ASSEMBLAGES IN TEMPORARY FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DETECTING RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL WATER ALLOCATIONS
【24h】

HYDROLOGIC REGIME AND MACROPHYTE ASSEMBLAGES IN TEMPORARY FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DETECTING RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL WATER ALLOCATIONS

机译:临时洪泛湿地的水份系统和宏观植物组合:对环境水分配的反应的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study describes the macrophyte assemblages of temporary floodplain wetlands situated on the floodplain of the Murray River, southeast Australia. Wetlands in the study are subject to flooding, the frequency, duration, and magnitude of which are dictated by the current, regulated river-flow regime. Our aim was to examine the influence of the existing flooding regime on macrophyte assemblages and to trial a monitoring program, based on a multiple before-after-control-impact (MBACI) design, to detect the impact of proposed environmental water allocations (EWAs) on the wetlands. Two categories of flooding regime were identified based on the flow magnitudes required for flooding to occur (flooding thresholds). In this scheme, wetlands with relatively low flooding thresholds are classed as 'impact' and those with higher thresholds are classed as 'control.' The wetlands were surveyed over a two-year period that incorporated at least one wetting-drying cycle at all wetlands. Results showed significant differences between survey times (season and year), but differences between flooding regime categories were significant only for some components of macrophyte assemblages. Differences between survey dates appear to reflect largely short-term responses to the most recent flood events. However, macrophyte differences observed between control and impact wetlands reflected the cumulative effect of flood events over several years. Differences between control and impact wetlands were strongest for post-flooding surveys based on full assemblages (using ANOSIM) and among specific taxa and functional groups (using ANOVA). Power to detect differences between control and impact wetlands was greatest for species richness and total abundance, but taxa with low variability among wetlands, and hence good power, were actually less sensitive to hytlrologic change. We conclude that the MBACI design used in this sludy will be most effective in detecting wetland ecosystem responses to the implementation of EWAs if response variables are carefully chosen based on their sensitivity to hydrologic change.
机译:这项研究描述了位于澳大利亚东南部默里河洪泛区的临时洪泛区湿地的大型植物群落。该研究中的湿地容易遭受洪水的侵袭,其频率,持续时间和大小取决于当前受监管的河水流域。我们的目标是研究现有的洪水制度对大型植物群落的影响,并基于多个“事后控制影响”(MBACI)设计,尝试一项监测计划,以检测拟议的环境水分配(EWA)的影响在湿地上。根据洪水发生所需的流量大小(洪水阈值),确定了两类洪水制度。在此方案中,将洪水阈值相对较低的湿地归类为“影响”,而将阈值较高的湿地归类为“控制”。对湿地进行了为期两年的调查,在所有湿地中至少纳入了一个干湿循环。结果表明,调查时间(季节和年份)之间存在显着差异,但洪水制度类别之间的差异仅对于大型植物组合的某些组成部分才具有显着性。调查日期之间的差异似乎在很大程度上反映了对最新洪水事件的短期反应。但是,在控制湿地和影响湿地之间观察到的大型植物差异反映了洪水事件几年来的累积影响。对于淹没后调查,基于完整组合(使用ANOSIM)以及特定分类群和功能组(使用ANOVA)之间,控制湿地和影响湿地之间的差异最大。对于物种丰富度和总丰度而言,检测控制湿地和影响湿地之间差异的能力最大,但是湿地间变异性较低的分类单元因此具有良好的能力,实际上对水文变化不那么敏感。我们得出的结论是,如果根据响应者对水文变化的敏感性精心选择响应变量,则该流程中使用的MBACI设计将最有效地检测湿地生态系统对EWA的响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号