...
首页> 外文期刊>West European Politics >Opting Out of an Ever Closer Union: The Integration Doxa and the Management of Sovereignty
【24h】

Opting Out of an Ever Closer Union: The Integration Doxa and the Management of Sovereignty

机译:退出更加紧密的联盟:一体化Doxa与主权管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How is sovereignty managed in the EU? This article investigates the relationship between sovereignty and European integration through the prism of national opt-outs from EU treaties, addressing an apparent contradiction in contemporary European governance: the contrasting processes of integration and differentiation. On the one hand, European integration is increasing as states transfer sovereign competencies to the EU. On the other hand, we see a multitude of differentiation processes through which member states choose to disengage from the EU polity by negotiating exemptions or derogations. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu's political sociology, the article argues that to understand how sovereignty is interpreted and exercised in the EU, it is necessary to focus not only on the constitutive and regulative dimensions of sovereignty, but equally on the practice dimension. This entails an exploration of how sovereignty claims are managed in a particular social setting. Rather than seeing opt-outs as classic instruments of international law, accentuating the member states' unchanged sovereignty, the article argues that the management of the British and Danish opt-outs quite paradoxically expresses the strength of the doxa of European integration, i.e. the notion of a??an ever closer uniona??.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591102
机译:在欧盟如何管理主权?本文通过从欧盟条约中选择国家退出的角度来研究主权与欧洲一体化之间的关系,解决了当代欧洲治理中的一个明显矛盾:一体化与分化的对比过程。一方面,随着国家将主权能力转移给欧盟,欧洲一体化程度正在提高。另一方面,我们看到了多种分化过程,成员国通过谈判豁免或克减选择脱离欧盟政体。文章以皮埃尔·布尔迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的政治社会学为依据,认为要理解欧盟如何解释和行使主权,不仅有必要侧重于主权的构成性和规范性方面,而且还应侧重于实践方面。这需要探索在特定的社会环境下如何处理主权要求。文章认为,英国和丹麦的选择退出的管理相当矛盾地表达了欧洲一体化的实力,即概念,而不是将退出视为国际法的经典工具,而是强调成员国的主权不变。查看全文下载相关全文var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg, google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591102

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号