...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology >Johnsongrass (Sorghum Halepense) Control and Economics of Using Glyphosate-resistant Soybean in Fallowed Sugarcane Fields1
【24h】

Johnsongrass (Sorghum Halepense) Control and Economics of Using Glyphosate-resistant Soybean in Fallowed Sugarcane Fields1

机译:约翰逊草(高粱Halepense)在休闲甘蔗田中使用抗草甘膦大豆的控制和经济性 1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Johnsongrass control in fallowed sugarcane fields was evaluated with glyphosate and the graminicides quizalofop, fluazifop, and clethodim applied in soybean compared with nonsoybean tillage and glyphosate programs. Glyphosate was applied to glyphosate-resistant soybean as a single early postemergence (EPOST) treatment around 30 d after planting (DAP) at rates of 840, 1,120, or 2,240 g ai/ha; as sequential treatments EPOST and late postemergence (LPOST) around 60 DAP at 560 followed by (fb) 560 or 1,120 fb 1,120 g/ha; or as a single LPOST treatment at 2,240 g/ha. Quizalofop at 77 g ai/ha, fluazifop at 420 g ai/ha, and clethodim at 280 g ai/ha were also evaluated as single EPOST treatments. In 1996 johnsongrass control 7 d after EPOST treatment (DAT) was at least 90% for glyphosate treatments but control was 73 to 77% for the graminicides. In 1997 johnsongrass control 7 DAT was at least 82% for all herbicide treatments. Excellent johnsongrass control approximately 50 DAT was achieved both years with all the glyphosate and graminicide treatments. In the nonsoybean fallow weed control programs where plots were tilled twice or three times fb one or two glyphosate applications, complete control of johnsongrass was obtained both years. In 1996 when glyphosate was applied EPOST or EPOST fb LPOST, soybean yields were equivalent and averaged 3.3 times that of the single LPOST glyphosate application. Soybean yields where the graminicides were used and where glyphosate was applied as a single LPOST treatment were no greater than the nontreated control. Economic analysis on the basis of soybean yield data and variable costs of herbicides, seed, field application, seedbed preparation, tillage, labor, fuel, repairs, and custom harvest expense in 1996 showed a positive net return only for glyphosate applied EPOST at 840 g/ha ($99.82/ha) or 1,120 g/ha ($46.94/ha) and for glyphosate applied at 560 g/ha EPOST fb LPOST ($10.41/ha). Although showing a negative net return, glyphosate applied EPOST at 2,240 g/ha ($−8.32/ha) or EPOST fb LPOST at 1,120 g/ha ($−50.97/ha), the loss was less than that for nonsoybean fallow tillage and glyphosate programs ($−155.70/ha and $−157.78/ha). In 1997, when soybean was not harvested because of environmental conditions, variable costs exceeded those of the nonsoybean programs, indicating that planting soybean strictly as a cover crop would not be economically advantageous. Sugarcane growth and yield the year following the fallow programs was not negatively affected by production of soybean regardless of herbicide program.
机译:用草甘膦评估了休耕甘蔗田的约翰逊草防治效果,与非大豆耕作和草甘膦计划相比,在大豆中施用了除草剂quizalofop,fluazifop和clethodim。在种植后约30 d(DAP),草甘膦作为抗发性草甘膦的大豆以单一早期芽后(EPOST)处理施用,施用量为840、1,120或2,240 g ai / ha;作为EPOST和出芽后期后期(LPOST)的序贯治疗,在560时约为60 DAP,然后是(fb)560或1,120 fb 1,120 g / ha;或以2240克/公顷的单次LPOST处理。还评估了单次EPOST治疗的剂量为77 g ai / ha的Quizalofop,420 g ai / ha的fluazifop和280 g ai / ha的ceethodim。 1996年,EPOST处理(DAT)后7 d,草甘膦处理的约翰逊草控制量至少为90%,而杀草草剂的控制量为73%至77%。 1997年,对于所有除草剂处理,约翰逊草的对照7 DAT至少为82%。使用草甘膦和除草剂处理,两年都达到了出色的约翰逊草控制效果,约为50 DAT。在非大豆休耕杂草控制计划中,在一次或两次施用草甘膦的情况下,将地块耕作两次或三次,两年都获得了对约翰逊草的完全控制。在1996年使用EPOST或EPOST fb LPOST施用草甘膦时,大豆产量相当,平均为单次LPOST草甘膦施用量的3.3倍。使用杀草剂和单次LPOST处理施用草甘膦的大豆产量不高于未处理的对照。根据大豆产量数据和除草剂,种子,田间施用,苗床准备,耕种,人工,燃料,维修和习俗收获费用的变动成本进行的经济分析表明,仅使用草甘膦的EPOST在840 g上可获得正净收益/ ha($ 99.82 / ha)或1,120 g / ha($ 46.94 / ha),草甘膦的施用量为560 g / ha EPOST fb LPOST($ 10.41 / ha)。尽管显示出负的净收益,但草甘膦的EPOST用量为2,240 g / ha($ −8.32 / ha)或EPOST fb LPOST用量为1,120 g / ha($ −50.97 / ha),其损失小于非大豆休闲耕作和草甘膦计划($ −155.70 / ha和$ −157.78 / ha)。 1997年,由于环境条件未收割大豆,可变成本超过了非大豆计划的可变成本,这表明严格种植大豆作为农作物是不经济的。无论采用何种除草剂计划,休耕计划后一年的甘蔗生长和单产都不会受到大豆产量的负面影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Weed Technology 》 |2006年第4期| p.980-985| 共6页
  • 作者单位

    Professor, Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, Louisiana State University AgCenter, 104 Sturgis Hall., Baton Rouge, LA 70803;

    Associate Professor, Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State University AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366;

    and Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University AgCenter, 101 Agricultural Administration, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Corresponding author's E-mail: dmiller@agcenter.lsu.edu.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Graminicides; net return; perennial weed control; tillage; variable costs; weed control programs.;

    机译:杀草剂;净回报;多年生杂草控制耕作;可变成本;杂草控制程序。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号