【24h】

MAN VS. MACHINE

机译:男人与 机器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The need for this column has finally arrived. I refer to the timeless issue and debate of "man versus machine." Now, I am not against the inherent improvements and easier lifestyles that have come with increasing technology. I certainly would not be the one to fetch water using a windlass from a well or in a bucket from a creek a half mile from my house. Nor would I want to drive a team of horses in a circle all day to drill a 20-foot-deep well. But I do feel our reliance on machines may have passed a point of no return and that we should back up, take another look at the situation, and then make a careful decision as to how much technology we really need or want in our daily lives. A National Research Council committee in 1951 attempted to characterize the differences in human-computer interaction -then called human-machine interaction-prior to developing the national air traffic control system. The result was a set of characteristics called the Fitts List, which detailed the relative strengths and limitations of humans versus computers (see Table 1). This list is sometimes referred to as what "men are better at" as opposed to what "machines are better at" and provides an eye-opening appraisal of what was believed before the recent expansion of technology occurred.
机译:对这一列的需求终于到了。我指的是“男人与机器”的永恒问题和辩论。现在,我并不反对具有越来越多的技术的固有改进和更容易的生活方式。我当然不会是用冬季或桶里从我家的一半英里的桶中使用壁板的水。我也不想在整个一天坐在圆圈中驾驶一支马匹,钻一个20英尺深。但我确实觉得我们对机器的依赖可能已经通过了一个没有回报,并且我们应该备份,另一点看看情况,然后仔细决定我们在日常生活中真正需要多少技术或想要多少技术。 1951年,国家研究委员会委员会试图表征人机互动的差异 - 在发展国家空中交通管制系统之前称为人机互动。结果是一系列称为FITTS列表的特征,详细说明了人类与计算机的相对优势和局限性(见表1)。此列表有时被称为“男性更好地”,而不是“机器更好”,并提供了在最近发生技术扩展之前所迈出的瞩目的宣传评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water well journal》 |2021年第11期|46-48|共3页
  • 作者

    Ed Butts;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号