首页> 外文期刊>Water Technology >Conductivity and TDS: Which is better for field-testing?
【24h】

Conductivity and TDS: Which is better for field-testing?

机译:电导率和TDS:哪种更适合现场测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The POU/POE market is currently seeing a sharp increase in both sales demand and the perceived need for handheld and in-line process meters and controllers, probably as a direct result of the public's concern for their safety and health related to water consumption. Traditionally referred to as handheld devices, and used by POU/POE industry professionals to measure at least one water quality parameter, meters are becoming increasingly sophisticated, but not necessarily more accurate or easy to use. Compounding this problem is a need for regulators and manufacturers of these devices to educate both dealers and consumers on which parameters are genuinely important on a real time basis for ensuring the public's health and safety and which are not. The following information will outline why total dissolved solids (TDS) values in handheld and in-line process meters and controllers differ from analytical lab results.
机译:当前,POU / POE市场的销售需求以及对手持式和在线式过程仪表和控制器的需求都在急剧增加,这可能是公众对其与用水有关的安全性和健康问题表示关注的直接结果。传统上称为手持设备,并且POU / POE行业专业人员使用它来测量至少一个水质参数,水表正在变得越来越复杂,但不一定更精确或易于使用。使这些问题更加复杂的是,这些设备的监管者和制造商需要教育经销商和消费者,以实时为基础确保真正重要的参数对确保公众的健康和安全具有重要意义。以下信息将概述为何手持式和在线式过程仪表以及控制器中的总溶解固体(TDS)值与分析实验室结果不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号