首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Fault tree analysis for urban flooding
【24h】

Fault tree analysis for urban flooding

机译:城市洪水的故障树分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditional methods to evaluate flood risk generally focus on heavy storm events as the principalncause of flooding. Conversely, fault tree analysis is a technique that aims at modelling allnpotential causes of flooding. It quantifies both overall flood probability and relative contributionsnof individual causes of flooding. This paper presents a fault model for urban flooding and annapplication to the case of Haarlem, a city of 147,000 inhabitants. Data from a complaint register,nrainfall gauges and hydrodynamic model calculations are used to quantify probabilities of basicnevents in the fault tree. This results in a flood probability of 0.78/week for Haarlem. It is shownnthat gully pot blockages contribute to 79% of flood incidents, whereas storm events contributenonly 5%. This implies that for this case more efficient gully pot cleaning is a more effectivenstrategy to reduce flood probability than enlarging drainage system capacity. Whether this is alsonthe most cost-effective strategy can only be decided after risk assessment has beenncomplemented with a quantification of consequences of both types of events. To do this will benthe next step in this study.
机译:评估洪水风险的传统方法通常将大风暴事件作为洪水的主要原因。相反,故障树分析是一种旨在对洪水的全能原因进行建模的技术。它既可以量化总体洪水概率,也可以量化各个洪水原因的相对贡献。本文介绍了一个城市洪水的断层模型,并将其应用于哈勒姆市(Haarlem),该市有14.7万居民。来自投诉记录,雨量计和水动力模型计算的数据用于量化故障树中基本事件的概率。这导致哈勒姆每周发生水灾的概率为0.78。结果表明,沟渠堵塞占洪水事件的79%,而风暴事件仅占5%。这意味着在这种情况下,与扩大排水系统的容量相比,更有效的沟壑清洁是一种减少洪水可能性的更有效的策略。这是否也是最具成本效益的策略,只有在风险评估与两种事件后果的量化互补之后才能确定。要做到这一点,将是本研究的下一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号