首页> 外文期刊>Water SA >Removal of waterborne bacteria from surface water and groundwater by cost-effective household water treatment systems (HWTS): A sustainable solution for improving water quality in rural communities of Africa
【24h】

Removal of waterborne bacteria from surface water and groundwater by cost-effective household water treatment systems (HWTS): A sustainable solution for improving water quality in rural communities of Africa

机译:具有成本效益的家用水处理系统(HWTS)去除地表水和地下水中的水生细菌:改善非洲农村社区水质的可持续解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study 5 household water-treatment devices/systems (HWTS) were constructed using inexpensive local materials (sand, gravel, zeolites and clays). They included the silver-impregnated porous pot filter (SIPP), the ceramic candle filter (CCF), the conventional biosand filter (BSF-S), a modified biosand filter with zeolites (BSF-Z), and a bucket filter (BF). Their ability to remove turbidity and pathogenic bacteria (Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella typhimurium and Shigella dysenteriae) from synthetic sterile water, groundwater and surface-water sources was evaluated. The flow rates ranged from 0.05 e·h~(-1) to 2.49 e·h~(-1) for SIPP; e·h~(-1) to 4 e·h~(-1) for CCF; 0.81 e·h~(-1) to 6.84 e·h~(-1) for BSF-S; 1.74 e·h~(-1) to 19.2 e·h~(-1) for BSF-Z; and from 106.5 e·h~(-1) to 160.5 e·h~(-1) for BF. The highest (64% to 98% (0.74 to 1.08 NTU)) and lowest (14% to 76% (2.91 to 7.19 NTU)) average percentage turbidity removals were noted for SIPP and BF, respectively. The SIPP was the only device that consistently removed 100% of all target pathogens throughout the study. Its performance was found to be significantly superior (p<0.05) compared to that of the other four devices. Sixty (60%) to 100% bacterial removals were observed for BSF-S; 90% to 100% for BSF-Z; 90% to 100% for CCF; and 40% to 99.9% for BF. Based on the findings of this study the SIPP can be recommended for use by rural communities as it consistently produced high-quality water that complied with the SANS 241 turbidity and microbiological limits for drinking water.
机译:在这项研究中,使用廉价的当地材料(沙子,砾石,沸石和粘土)建造了5个家庭水处理设备/系统(HWTS)。它们包括浸银的多孔罐式过滤器(SIPP),陶瓷烛式过滤器(CCF),常规生物砂过滤器(BSF-S),带沸石的改良生物砂过滤器(BSF-Z)和桶式过滤器(BF) 。评估了它们从合成无菌水,地下水和地表水源中去除浊度和病原细菌(霍乱弧菌,鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和痢疾志贺氏菌)的能力。 SIPP的流速范围为0.05e·h〜(-1)至2.49e·h〜(-1)。 CCF为e·h〜(-1)至4 e·h〜(-1); BSF-S为0.81 e·h〜(-1)至6.84 e·h〜(-1);对于BSF-Z,从1.74 e·h〜(-1)到19.2 e·h〜(-1);高炉从106.5 e·h〜(-1)到160.5 e·h〜(-1)。 SIPP和BF的平均浊度去除率最高(64%至98%(0.74至1.08 NTU))和最低(14%至76%(2.91至7.19 NTU))。在整个研究过程中,SIPP是唯一能够始终去除100%所有目标病原体的设备。与其他四个设备相比,它的性能显着优越(p <0.05)。观察到BSF-S去除了六十(60%)至100%的细菌。 BSF-Z为90%至100%; CCF为90%至100%;高炉为40%至99.9%。根据本研究的结果,SIPP可以建议农村社区使用,因为它始终产生符合SANS 241浊度和饮用水微生物学限值的高质量水。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water SA》 |2013年第4期|445-456|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental, Water and Earth Science, Tshwane University of Technology, 175 Nelson Mandela Drive, Pretoria 0002, South Africa;

    Department of Applied Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 17011, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa;

    Department of Environmental, Water and Earth Science, Tshwane University of Technology, 175 Nelson Mandela Drive, Pretoria 0002, South Africa;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    safe drinking water; household water treatment; waterborne pathogens;

    机译:安全的饮用水;家用水处理;水性病原体;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号