...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Ownership and Performance in Water Services Revisited: Does Private Management Really Outperform Public?
【24h】

Ownership and Performance in Water Services Revisited: Does Private Management Really Outperform Public?

机译:再谈水务业的所有权和绩效:私人管理真的能胜过公众吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the late 1970s, water services have been privatised in some developed countries in an attempt to improve performance. However, after three decades of privatisations the superiority of private management is being called into question and several cities are returning to public provision. In this paper we revisit the relationship between ownership and performance in urban water services management using directional distance functions, metafrontiers and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) techniques. The technical efficiency in the provision of water delivery services in a sample of Spanish municipalities is assessed at the level of the management of specific production factors; moreover, we discuss whether differences in efficiency between private and public decision units are due to either different capabilities of managers (managerial efficiency) or different technological restrictions (ownership efficiency). Our main finding is that private management is more efficient in the use of labour input, mainly because of the technological restrictions faced by public management units, such as legal and institutional restrictions. Conversely, private management appears to be less efficient at managing operational costs.
机译:自1970年代后期以来,水服务已在一些发达国家私有化,以期改善绩效。然而,经过三十年的私有化,人们对私有管理的优越性提出了质疑,并且有几个城市正在恢复公共服务。在本文中,我们使用方向距离函数,元边界和数据包络分析(DEA)技术重新审视了城市供水服务管理中所有权与绩效之间的关系。在西班牙特定城市中,在具体生产要素的管理水平上评估了提供供水服务的技术效率;此外,我们讨论了私人决策部门和公共决策部门之间效率的差异是由于管理者的能力不同(管理效率)还是由于技术限制(所有权效率)引起的。我们的主要发现是,私人管理在使用劳动投入方面更为有效,这主要是由于公共管理部门面临的技术限制,例如法律和制度限制。相反,私人管理在管理运营成本方面似乎效率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号