首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Comprehensive comparison of chemically enhanced primary treatment and high-rate activated sludge in novel wastewater treatment plant configurations
【24h】

Comprehensive comparison of chemically enhanced primary treatment and high-rate activated sludge in novel wastewater treatment plant configurations

机译:新型废水处理厂配置中化学强化一级处理和高速率活性污泥的综合比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Novel wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are designed to be more energy efficient than conventional plants. One approach to becoming more energy efficient is the pre-concentration of organic carbon through chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) or high-rate activated sludge (HRAS). This study compares these approaches in terms of energy demand, operational costs, organic micropollutants (OMP), and virus removal efficiency. A CEPT pilot-scale plant was operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 30 min, and a lab-scale HRAS reactor was operated at an HRT of 2 h and a solid retention time (SRT) of 1 d in continuous mode. A minimum dose of 150 mg/L ferric chloride (FeCl3) was required to achieve a threshold chemical oxygen demand (COD)-to-ammonium ratio below 2 g COD to 1 g of NH4+-N (fulfilling the requirement for a partial nitritation-anammox reactor), reaching high phosphate (PO43-)-removal efficiency (>99%). A slightly lower COD recovery was attained in the HRAS reactor, due to the partial oxidation of the influent COD (15%). The lower PO43- removal efficiency achieved in the HRAS configuration (13%) was enhanced to a comparable value of that achieved in CEPT by the addition of 30 mg/L FeCl3 at the clarifier. The CEPT configuration was less energy-intensive (0.07 vs 0.13 kWh/m(3) of wastewater) but had significantly higher operational costs than the HRAS-based configuration (6.0 vs 3.8 ce/m(3) of wastewater). For OMPs with k(biol) > 10 L/gvss.d, considerably higher removal efficiencies were achieved in HRAS (80-90%) than in CEPT (4-55%). For the remaining OMPs, the biotransformation efficiencies were generally higher in HRAS than in CEPT but were below 55% in both configurations. Finally, CEPT was less efficient than HRAS for virus removal. HRAS followed by FeCl3 post-treatment appeared to be a more effective alternative than CEPT for COD pre-concentration in novel WWTPs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:新型废水处理厂(WWTP)的设计比常规工厂更节能。一种提高能源效率的方法是通过化学强化一级处理(CEPT)或高速率活性污泥(HRAS)来预浓缩有机碳。这项研究从能源需求,运营成本,有机微污染物(OMP)和病毒清除效率方面比较了这些方法。 CEPT中试规模的工厂在30分钟的水力停留时间(HRT)下运行,而实验室规模的HRAS反应器在连续模式下的HRT为2小时,固体停留时间(SRT)为1 d。为了达到低于2 g COD对1 g NH4 + -N的最低化学需氧量(铵)与铵的比率,最低剂量为150 mg / L氯化铁(FeCl3)(满足部分亚硝化的要求-厌氧氨氧化反应器),达到高磷酸盐(PO43-)去除效率(> 99%)。由于进水COD的部分氧化(15%),在HRAS反应器中获得的COD回收率略低。通过在澄清器中添加30 mg / L FeCl3,在HRAS配置中实现的较低的PO43去除效率(13%)提高到了CEPT中可实现的相当值。与基于HRAS的配置(6.0 vs. 3.8 ce / m(3)的废水)相比,CEPT配置的能源消耗较少(0.07 vs. 0.13 kWh / m(3)的废水),但运行成本却明显更高。对于k(biol)> 10 L / gvss.d的OMP,HRAS(80-90%)的去除效率要比CEPT(4-55%)更高。对于其余的OMP,HRAS中的生物转化效率通常高于CEPT,但两种配置均低于55%。最后,CEPT的病毒清除效率不及HRAS。对于新型污水处理厂中的COD预浓缩,HRAS继之以FeCl3后处理似乎比CEPT更有效。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号