首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >Court Finds Coal Company Failed To Preserve Cost Claims In CWA Veto Suit
【24h】

Court Finds Coal Company Failed To Preserve Cost Claims In CWA Veto Suit

机译:法院裁定煤炭公司未能保留CWA否决权诉讼中的成本要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a split decision is upholding EPA's Clean Water Act (CWA) decision to block disposal sites underlying a final permit for a West Virginia coal mine, finding that the mining company failed to preserve its claims that the agency must consider costs of blocking the project. Both the narrowly written majority opinion by Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson and a vigorous dissent written by Judge Brett Kavanaugh, however, leave the door open for future rulings that EPA must consider a company's reliance costs associated with a project when making decisions under CWA section 404(c), the agency's so-called veto authority, particularly when a final permit has already been issued by the Army Corps of Engineers.
机译:美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的一项分案裁决支持美国环保署(EPA)的《清洁水法》(CWA)的决定,该决定封锁了西弗吉尼亚州煤矿最终许可所依据的处置场,发现该矿业公司未能保留其索赔要求。该机构必须考虑阻止该项目的成本。不过,无论是Karen LeCraft Henderson法官的狭义多数意见,还是Brett Kavanaugh法官的强烈异议,都为未来的裁决敞开了大门,因为EPA在根据CWA第404条做出决定时必须考虑公司与项目相关的信赖成本( c)该机构的所谓否决权,特别是在陆军工程兵团已经签发最终许可时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号