首页> 外文期刊>Water Intelligence Online >Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies
【24h】

Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies

机译:迈向可再生的未来:评估资源回收作为可行的替代方案:采用提取营养回收技术的设施的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Extractive nutrient recovery, defined as the production of chemical nutrient products devoid of significant organic matter, represents a complementary strategy for managing nutrients in multiple waste streams. In this option, energy and resources are used to accumulate and produce a chemical nutrient product that is recyclable and has a resale value that could potentially help offset operating costs while reducing nutrient production from raw materials for agricultural or other uses.This report presents a compilation of case studies of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) at various stages of implementation of extractive nutrient recovery technologies in the form of struvite crystallization. Of the 20 WRRFs identified in this report, six have implemented or are implementing a struvite crystallization facility and seven have performed desktop and/or pilot evaluations. Data from these 13 utilities were used to develop the Tool for Evaluating Resource Recovery-Phosphorus (TERRY – Phosphorus), which was used to perform a conceptual level evaluation of implementing struvite recovery at seven other WRRFs.Data from the full-scale WRRFs that have implemented struvite recovery indicate that sidestream soluble phosphorus removals ranged from 80 to 90%, while ammonia removal ranged from 7 to 30%. Struvite production ranged from 64 to 421 metric tonnes per year and was found to be dependent on the site-specific conditions and technology employed. Drivers for implementing nutrient recovery included reduction in supplemental carbon requirements for nitrogen removal, reduction in aeration requirements, reduction in biosolids production versus conventional treatment alternatives, reduction in costs associated with mitigating nuisance precipitate formation, benefits to sludge dewaterability, and benefits associated with manipulating the N and P content of the biosolids. Quantifying the economic and non-economic benefits of these drivers together with site-specific factors can help drive the implementation of resource recovery systems at full-scale WRRFs.This title belongs to WERF Research Report Series ISBN: 9781780407920 (eBook)
机译:提取性养分的回收,定义为不含大量有机物的化学养分产品的生产,是管理多种废物流中养分的补充策略。在此方案中,能源和资源用于积累和生产可循环再利用的化学营养产品,其转售价值可以潜在地抵消运营成本,同时减少农业或其他用途原料的营养物质生产。本报告提供了汇总鸟粪石结晶形式的提取营养物回收技术实施过程中各个阶段的水资源回收设施(WRRF)案例研究。在本报告中确定的20个WRRF中,有6个已经实施或正在实施鸟粪石结晶设施,另外7个已经进行了台式和/或中试评估。来自这13个实用程序的数据用于开发资源评估磷的工具(TERRY – Phosphorus),该工具用于对在其他七个WRRF处实现鸟粪石回收进行概念性的评估。进行的鸟粪石回收表明,侧流的可溶性磷去除率为80%至90%,而氨去除率为7%至30%。鸟粪石的产量为每年64吨至421吨不等,并且取决于现场特定条件和所采用的技术。实施营养物回收的驱动因素包括减少除氮所需的补充碳需求,减少通气需求,与传统处理方法相比减少生物固体产量,减少与减少滋扰性沉淀物形成相关的成本,降低污泥脱水性的好处以及与操作污泥有关的好处。生物固体中的氮和磷含量。量化这些驱动因素的经济和非经济利益,以及特定于站点的因素,可以帮助推动大规模WRRF实施资源回收系统。此标题属于WERF研究报告系列ISBN:9781780407920(eBook)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号