...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental performance review and cost analysis of MSW landfilling by baling-wrapping technology versus conventional system
【24h】

Environmental performance review and cost analysis of MSW landfilling by baling-wrapping technology versus conventional system

机译:打包包装技术与传统系统相比对生活垃圾填埋场的环境绩效评估和成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper first reviews the chemical, physical and biological processes, and the environmental performance of MSW compacted and plastic-wrapped into air-tight bales with low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The baling-wrapping process halts the short and half-term biological activity and consequently the emission of gases and leachates. It also facilitates the handling of the refuse, and considerably reduces the main environmental impacts of a landfill. The main technologies available for baling-wrapping MSW are also presented. Furthermore, a cost analysis comparing a conventional landfill (CL) without baling system versus two landfills using different baling-wrapping technologies (rectangular and cylindrical bales) is carried out. The results are presented comparatively under the conditions of construction, operation and maintenance and postclosure, as required by European Directive 1999/31. A landfill using rectangular plastic-wrapped bales (LRPB) represents an economically competitive option compared to a CL. The increased capacity of the waste disposal zone when using rectangular bales due to the high density of the bales compensates for the increased operating and maintenance (O&M) costs of the method. Landfills using cylindrical plastic-wrapped bales (LCPB's) do not fare so well, mainly because the density within the bales is lower, the cylindrical geometry of the bales does not allow such an efficient use of the space within the landfill, and the processing capacity of the machinery is lower. From the cost model, the resulting unit costs per tonne in a LRPB, a LCPB and a CL for 100,000 t/year of waste, an operation time of 15 years and a landfill depth (H) of 20 m, are 31.52, 43.36 and 31.83 EUD/t, respectively.
机译:本文首先回顾了用低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)压实并塑料包裹成气密捆的城市固体废弃物的化学,物理和生物过程以及环境性能。打包包装过程中止了短期和半年的生物活性,因此停止了气体和渗滤液的排放。它还有利于垃圾的处理,并大大减少了垃圾填埋场对环境的主要影响。还介绍了可用于打包MSW的主要技术。此外,还进行了成本分析,将不带打包系统的常规垃圾填埋场(CL)与使用不同打包带包装技术(矩形和圆柱形打包)的两个垃圾填埋场进行了比较。根据欧洲指令1999/31的要求,在结构,运行和维护以及关闭后的条件下比较地介绍了结果。与CL相比,使用矩形塑料包裹捆(LRPB)的垃圾掩埋在经济上更具竞争力。当使用矩形捆时,由于捆的高密度而增加了废物处理区的容量,从而弥补了该方法增加的运营和维护(O&M)成本。使用圆柱形塑料包裹捆包(LCPB)的垃圾填埋场效果不佳,主要是因为捆包内的密度较低,捆包的圆柱几何形状无法有效利用垃圾填埋场内的空间以及处理能力机械的位置较低。根据成本模型,LRPB,LCPB和CL的100,000吨/年废物,15年的运行时间和20 m的堆填深度(H)的每吨单位成本分别为31.52、43.36和31.83 EUD / t。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号