首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills
【24h】

A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills

机译:城市生活垃圾填埋场长期管理方法综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After closure, municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills must be managed and controlled to avoid adverse effects on human health and the environment (HHE). Aftercare (or post-closure care) can be brought to an end when the authorities consider the landfill to no longer pose a threat to HHE. Different approaches have been suggested for long-term landfill management and evaluation of aftercare completion. In this paper, research on aftercare and its completion is analyzed and regulatory approaches for the completion of landfill aftercare are reviewed. Approaches to aftercare could be categorized as (Ⅰ) target values, (Ⅱ) impact/risk assessment, and (Ⅲ) performance based. Comparison of these approaches illustrates that each has limitations and strengths. While target values are typically used as screening indicators to be complemented with site-specific assessments, impact/risk assessment approaches address the core issue about aftercare completion, but face large uncertainties and require a high level of expertise. A performance-based approach allows for the combination of target values and impact/risk assessments in a consistent evaluation framework with the aim of sequentially reducing aftercare intensity and, ultimately, leading to the completion of aftercare. At a regulatory level, simple qualitative criteria are typically used as the primary basis for defining completion of aftercare, most likely due to the complexity of developing rigorous evaluation methodologies. This paper argues that development of transparent and consistent regulatory procedures represents the basis for defining the desired state of a landfill at the end of aftercare and for reducing uncertainty about the intensity and duration of aftercare. In this context, recently presented technical guidelines and the ongoing debate with respect to their regulatory acceptance are a valuable step towards developing strategies for the cost-effective protection of HHE at closed MSW landfills. To assess the practicality of evaluation methodologies for aftercare, well-documented case studies including regulatory review and acceptance are needed.
机译:关闭后,必须对市政固体废物(MSW)垃圾填埋场进行管理和控制,以避免对人类健康和环境(HHE)产生不利影响。当当局认为垃圾填埋场不再对HHE构成威胁时,可以终止后期护理(或封闭后护理)。对于长期的垃圾掩埋管理和善后评估,已经提出了不同的方法。本文对后处理及其完成的研究进行了分析,并综述了垃圾掩埋后处理完成的监管方法。后续护理的方法可分为(Ⅰ)目标值,(Ⅱ)影响/风险评估和(Ⅲ)绩效。这些方法的比较表明,每种方法都有其局限性和优势。虽然通常将目标值用作筛查指标,并辅之以针对具体地点的评估,但影响/风险评估方法解决了关于完成护理的核心问题,但面临巨大的不确定性,需要高水平的专业知识。基于绩效的方法允许在一个一致的评估框架中结合目标值和影响/风险评估,目的是依次降低后期护理强度,并最终实现后期护理的完成。在监管层面,简单的定性标准通常被用作定义后续护理完成的主要基础,这很可能是由于开发严格的评估方法的复杂性。本文认为,透明和一致的监管程序的发展代表了定义后续处理结束时垃圾填埋场所需状态并减少后续处理强度和持续时间的不确定性的基础。在这种情况下,最近提出的技术指南以及有关其法规接受性的持续辩论是朝着制定战略的方向迈出的重要一步,该战略旨在在封闭的MSW垃圾填埋场中经济有效地保护HHE。为了评估后期护理评估方法的实用性,需要有据可查的案例研究,包括监管评审和接受。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2012年第3期|p.498-512|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Water Quality, Resources and Waste Management, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Wien, Austria;

    SUEZ Environnement, Rue du President Wilson 38, 78230 Le Pecq, France;

    Afvalzorg Deponie BV, P.O. Box 2, 1566 ZG Assendelft, The Netherlands;

    Ceosyntec Consultants, 10220 Old Columbia Road, Suite A, Columbia, MD 21046, USA;

    Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Campus Box 7908, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    MSW landfill; post-closure care; aftercare; completion criteria;

    机译:生活垃圾填埋场;关闭后的护理;善后完成标准;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号