首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass: An experimental comparison between process layouts
【24h】

Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass: An experimental comparison between process layouts

机译:废生物质的水热碳化:工艺布局之间的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper contributes to the knowledge on waste biomass conversion processes occurring in the presence of hot compressed water. The experimental procedure detailed herein assesses different process schemes based on the low-temperature reaction known as hydrothermal carbonization. The performances of two lab-scale reactor configurations, with and without a downstream flash expansion step, were evaluated and compared. Each setup was tested with six different types of waste biomass. Fir, beech, and olive prunings are representative of lignocellulosic raw materials, while potato, pea, and carrot are representative of non-lignocellulosic wastes from processing in the local agro-food industry. The batch reactions (200 °C, water/solid = 7/1) were carried out for up to 120 min. The hydrochars were characterized by elemental composition, humidity, heating value, and mass and energy yields. The extent of difference between the results obtained for the two procedures varied significantly with the material treated. At a residence time of 30 min, the solid yields increased due to expansion, ranging from 10 to 36% for lignocellulosic material and 50 to 220% for agro-food industry scraps. The downstream flash expansion step causes an increase of the solid yields, especially for hydrochars from lignocellulosic materials, leading to higher energy recovered compared to the configuration without expansion. Lignocellulosic and agro-food wastes behaved dissimilarly, likely because of different hydrothermal reaction pathways. The additional expansion step can considerably increase the efficiency of energy recovery in full-scale plants, the extent of which depends on the biomass waste substrate used.
机译:本文有助于在热压缩水存在下发生废物生物质转化过程的知识。本文详述的实验步骤基于称为水热碳化的低温反应评估不同的方法方案。评估和没有下游闪光膨胀步骤的两个实验室级反应器配置的性能。每种设置用六种不同类型的废物生物量测试。冷杉,山毛榉和橄榄灌浆是木质纤维素原料的代表,而马铃薯,豌豆和胡萝卜是来自当地农业食品工业的加工中的非木质纤维素废物。分批反应(200℃,水/固体= 7/1)均为高达120分钟进行。通过元素组成,湿度,加热值和质量和能量产量的特征在于羟基。所获得的两种方法的结果之间的差异程度显着随着所处理的材料而变化。在30分钟的停留时间,固体产率由于膨胀而增加,从而为木质纤维素材料的10%〜36%,50至220%用于农业食品工业废料。下游闪光膨胀步骤导致固体产率的增加,特别是对于从木质纤维素材料的羟基核,导致与配置相比恢复的能量较高,而不会膨胀。木质纤维素和农业食品废物的表现不佳,可能是因为不同的水热反应途径。额外的膨胀步骤可以大大提高全尺寸植物中能量回收效率,这取决于所使用的生物质废物基材。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号