...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Challenges and opportunities of solvent-based additive extraction methods for plastic recycling
【24h】

Challenges and opportunities of solvent-based additive extraction methods for plastic recycling

机译:溶剂回收塑料回收方法的挑战与机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Additives are ubiquitously used in plastics to improve their functionality. However, they are not always desirable in their 'second life' and are a major bottleneck for chemical recycling. Although research on extraction techniques for efficient removal of additives is increasing, it resembles much like uncharted territory due to the broad variety of additives, plastics and removal techniques. Today solvent-based additive extraction techniques, solid-liquid extraction and dissolution-precipitation, are considered to be the most promising techniques to remove additives. This review focuses on the assessment of these techniques by making a link between literature and physicochemical principles such as diffusion and Hansen solubility theory. From a technical point of view, dissolution-precipitation is preferred to remove a broad spectrum of additives because diffusion limitations affect the solid-liquid extraction recoveries. Novel techniques such as accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) are promising for finding the balance between these two processes. Because of limited studies on the economic and environmental feasibility of extraction methods, this review also includes a basic economic and environmental assessment of two extreme cases for the extraction of additives. According to this assessment, the feasibility of additives removal depends strongly on the type of additive and plastic and also on the extraction conditions. In the best-case scenario at least 70% of solvent recovery is required to extract plasticizers from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) via dissolution-precipitation with tetrahydrofuran (THF), while solid-liquid extraction of phenolic antioxidants and a fatty acid amide slip agents from polypropylene (PP) with dichloromethane (DCM) can be economically viable even without intensive solvent recovery.
机译:添加剂普遍用于塑料中以改善其功能。但是,它们在“第二人生”中并不总是理想的,并且是化学回收的主要瓶颈。尽管对有效去除添加剂的萃取技术的研究不断增加,但由于添加剂,塑料和去除技术的种类繁多,它与未知领域非常相似。如今,基于溶剂的添加剂萃取技术,固液萃取和溶解沉淀法被认为是去除添加剂最有希望的技术。本文通过将文献与物理化学原理(例如扩散和汉森溶解度理论)联系起来,着重于对这些技术的评估。从技术角度来看,溶解扩散是去除大量添加剂的首选方法,因为扩散限制会影响固液萃取的回收率。加速溶剂萃取(ASE)等新技术有望在这两个过程之间找到平衡。由于对萃取方法的经济和环境可行性的研究有限,因此本综述还包括对两种萃取添加剂的极端情况的基本经济和环境评估。根据该评估,去除添加剂的可行性在很大程度上取决于添加剂和塑料的类型以及提取条件。在最佳情况下,通过与四氢呋喃(THF)的溶解沉淀从聚氯乙烯(PVC)提取增塑剂,至少需要70%的溶剂回收率,而从酚醛抗氧化剂和脂肪酸酰胺增滑剂的固液提取即使不进行大量的溶剂回收,带有二氯甲烷(DCM)的聚丙烯(PP)也是经济可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号