...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Effects of pH buffering agents on the anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage of kitchen waste
【24h】

Effects of pH buffering agents on the anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage of kitchen waste

机译:pH缓冲剂对厨余废水厌氧水解酸化阶段的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study investigated effects of initial pH buffering agents on the lab-scale anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage of kitchen waste (KW). Different cheap, available and suitable buffering agents (NaOH (s), NaOH(l), CaO(s)-NaOH, KOH(l)-NaOH, K_2HPO_4(s)-KOH, Na_2CO_3(s)-NaOH) were added under optimal adjusting mode (first two days: per 16 h, after: one time per day) which was obtained in previous work. The effects of buffering agents were evaluated according to indexes of pH, VFAs, NH_4~+-N, TS, VS, VS/TS, TS and VS removal rate. The results showed treatment 5 with adding K_2HPO_4-KOH buffering agents had the most stable pH (6.7-7.0). Also treatment 5, 2, 4 and 6 provided stable pH ranging in 5-8. Among the treatments, treatment 6 with adding Na_2CO_3 as initial buffering agents and 10 mol/L NaOH as regulator was chosen as the optimal mode for highest VFAs content (44.05 g/L) with high acetic acid and butyrate acid proportion (42.64%), TS and VS removal rate (44.84% and 58.67%, respectively), low VS/TS ratio (58.55), fewer adding dosage and low adjusting frequency. The VFAs content of treatment 6 at the end of hydrolysis acidification stage could be used for methanogenic phase of anaerobic two-phase digestion. Thus, treatment 6 (adding Na_2CO_3 as initial buffering agents and 10 mol/L NaOH as regulator) with highest VFAs content and TS and VS removal rate could be considered using in anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage pH adjustment.
机译:这项研究调查了初始pH缓冲剂对厨房规模(KW)的实验室规模厌氧水解酸化阶段的影响。在下面添加不同的便宜,可用和合适的缓冲剂(NaOH,NaOH,CaO-NaOH,KOH-1-NaOH,K_2HPO_4-KOH,Na_2CO_3-NaOH)。在先前的工作中获得的最佳调整模式(前两天:每16小时,之后:每天一次)。根据pH,VFA,NH_4〜+ -N,TS,VS,VS / TS,TS和VS去除率的指标评估缓冲剂的作用。结果表明,添加K_2HPO_4-KOH缓冲剂的处理5具有最稳定的pH(6.7-7.0)。同样,处理5、2、4和6可提供5-8的稳定pH值。在这些处理中,选择添加Na_2CO_3作为初始缓冲剂和10 mol / L NaOH作为调节剂的处理6作为高乙酸和丁酸比例(42.64%)的最高VFA含量(44.05 g / L)的最佳模式, TS和VS去除率(分别为44.84%和58.67%),VS / TS比低(58.55),添加量少和调整频率低。水解酸化阶段结束时处理6的VFA含量可用于厌氧两相消化的产甲烷阶段。因此,在厌氧水解酸化阶段调节pH时,可以考虑采用VFA含量最高,TS和VS去除率最高的处理6(加入Na_2CO_3作为初始缓冲剂,加入10 mol / L NaOH作为调节剂)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2017年第10期|603-609|共7页
  • 作者单位

    College of Agronomy/Center of Biomass Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China,College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100793, China;

    College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100793, China;

    College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100793, China;

    College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100793, China;

    College of Agronomy/Center of Biomass Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China,College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100793, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Kitchen waste; Buffering agents; pH; Anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage; Adding mode;

    机译:厨房垃圾;缓冲剂;pH值厌氧水解酸化阶段;添加方式;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号