首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental impact comparison of four options to treat the cellulosic fraction of municipal solid waste (CF-MSW) in green megacities
【24h】

Environmental impact comparison of four options to treat the cellulosic fraction of municipal solid waste (CF-MSW) in green megacities

机译:在绿色大城市中处理四种城市固体废物(CF-MSW)纤维素部分的四种方案的环境影响比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Megacities are characterized by a high urban population density, and timely solid waste management is crucial for the wellbeing of its citizens. In this study, the cellulosic fraction of municipal solid waste is the target for management in Singapore (which has one of the highest population densities in the world) using four pertinent options incineration, anaerobic digestion, gasification and composting. The energy sustainability and environmental impacts in the form of greenhouse gas emissions are considered for each scenario together with the status quo to achieve the most favorable recommendation, with a sensitivity analysis in the case that no bio-fertilizers are allowed for use locally. In terms of GWP and energy profile for grass waste, AD is the most environmentally friendly option (2 kilo tonnes of CO2-eq and 23.3 GWh respectively), while for leaf waste, gasification is the best, with AD a close second. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:特大城市的特点是城市人口密度高,及时进行固体废物管理对其公民的福祉至关重要。在这项研究中,使用四种相关选择的焚烧,厌氧消化,气化和堆肥技术,将城市生活垃圾中的纤维素部分作为新加坡的管理目标(新加坡是世界上人口密度最高的国家之一)。对于每种方案,都考虑了以温室气体排放形式出现的能源可持续性和环境影响,以及为实现最有利建议而要进行的现状,并在不准许在当地使用生物肥料的情况下进行了敏感性分析。就草木废弃物的全球升温潜能值和能源状况而言,AD是最环保的选择(分别为2吨CO2当量和23.3 GWh),而对于叶片废弃物,气化是最佳的,而AD仅次于第二。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号