首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Benchmarking operational efficiency in waste collection: Discussion of current approaches and possible alternatives
【24h】

Benchmarking operational efficiency in waste collection: Discussion of current approaches and possible alternatives

机译:基准废物收集中的运营效率:讨论当前方法和可能的替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Efficiency assessment and benchmarking are crucial for managing any organization. However, especially from a regulatory perspective, such efficiency assessment and benchmarking must be unbiased from context-specific issues and should provide an absolute rating, rather than a relative one. The current work reviews the approaches used for performance assessment and benchmarking waste collection services, revealing that the majority are biased and are not absolute, and proposes two alternative context-unbiased and absolute performance indicators, the collection capacity use (CCU) and the segregated waste collection efficiency (SWE). The proposed indicators were calculated for 246 utilities operating in Portugal. The utilities were then ranked accordingly, and their position was compared with the position attained using the equivalent performance indicators in the system currently in use by the Portuguese service regulator. The results reveal ranking differences of over 50 positions and illustrate how misleading the results from context-biased and relative metrics can be.
机译:效率评估和基准对管理任何组织至关重要。但是,特别是从监管的角度来看,这种效率评估和基准必须从特定于背景的问题中取消偏消,并且应该提供绝对评级,而不是相对的额定值。目前的工作审查了用于绩效评估和基准收集服务的方法,揭示了大多数都有偏见并非绝对的,并提出了两个替代的上下文和绝对的绩效指标,收集能力使用(CCU)和隔离废物收集效率(SWE)。拟议的指标计算在葡萄牙经营的246家公用事业公司。然后,公用事业等待相应地进行排序,并将其位置与使用当前使用的系统中的等效性能指标所获得的位置进行比较,并使用葡萄牙服务监管机构。结果揭示了50多个位置的排序差异,并说明了如何误导来自上下文和相对度量的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号