首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Cost recovery of municipal solid waste management in small cities of inland China
【24h】

Cost recovery of municipal solid waste management in small cities of inland China

机译:中国内陆小城市生活垃圾管理成本回收

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Financial performance of waste management, the key for efficiency and sustainability, has rarely been studied in China, especially for small cities. Through questionnaires and interviews, we conducted such a case study in several cities aiming to fill the gap and improve waste service. We found that labour accounts for more than half to three-quarters of the operation cost, followed by fuel and vehicle maintenance. The waste service heavily relies on budget transfer of the municipality. User fees collected recover less than half of total operation cost at best, even if the collection rate is relatively high. The low cost recovery is mainly due to low fee rates, unchanged for years owing to public pressure. Public complaint seems to be justified by the finding that the service only accounts for 5-10% of municipal revenue annually and even lower in government spending. Contrary to general perception, per capita waste generation in small cities is not less than big ones. Waste composition is dominated by kitchen wastes, with fractions of recyclables and combustibles much lower than big cities. These findings have implications on the waste management strategy: commercial incineration or recycling may not be economically viable for small cities. The article concludes that user fees might better serve, and be designed for, behaviour change than for cost recovery. Municipalities need to first improve cost efficiency and transparency of waste services to gain public trust and support in order to tackle the biggest challenge facing developing countries, cost recovery.
机译:在中国,特别是在小城市,很少研究废物管理的财务绩效,这是效率和可持续性的关键。通过问卷调查和访谈,我们在几个城市进行了这样的案例研究,旨在填补空白并改善废物服务。我们发现劳动力占运营成本的一半以上至四分之三,其次是燃料和车辆维护。废物服务在很大程度上取决于市政当局的预算转移。即使收取的费用相对较高,所收取的使用费最多也只能收回不到总运营成本的一半。回收成本低的主要原因是费率低,由于公众的压力多年来没有变化。这项发现似乎证明了公众的抱怨是合理的,该服务每年仅占市政收入的5-10%,甚至更低的政府支出。与一般的看法相反,小城市的人均垃圾产生量不少于大城市。厨余是废物的主要成分,可回收和可燃物质的比例远低于大城市。这些发现对废物管理策略产生了影响:对于小城市来说,商业焚化或回收在经济上可能不可行。该文章得出的结论是,与改变成本相比,使用费可能更好地服务于行为改变并针对行为改变而设计。市政当局需要首先提高成本效率和废物服务的透明度,以获得公众的信任和支持,以应对发展中国家面临的最大挑战,即成本回收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号