首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: An approach based on the analytic hierarchy process
【24h】

Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: An approach based on the analytic hierarchy process

机译:为市政废物管理绩效低下的国家评估经济手段:一种基于层次分析法的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Economic instruments provide significant potential for countries with low municipal waste management performance in decreasing landfill rates and increasing recycling rates for municipal waste. In this research, strengths and weaknesses of landfill tax, pay-as-you-throw charging systems, deposit-refund systems and extended producer responsibility schemes are compared, focusing on conditions in countries with low waste management performance. In order to prioritise instruments for implementation in these countries, the analytic hierarchy process is applied using results of a literature review as input for the comparison. The assessment reveals that pay-as-you-throw is the most preferable instrument when utility-related criteria are regarded (w_b=0.35; analytic hierarchy process distributive mode; absolute comparison) mainly owing to its waste prevention effect, closely followed by landfill tax (w_b=0.32). Deposit-refund systems (w_b=0.17) and extended producer responsibility (w_b=0.16) rank third and fourth, with marginal differences owing to their similar nature. When cost-related criteria are additionally included in the comparison, landfill tax seems to provide the highest utility-cost ratio. Data from literature concerning cost (contrary to utility-related criteria) is currently not sufficiently available for a robust ranking according to the utility-cost ratio. In general, the analytic hierarchy process is seen as a suitable method for assessing economic instruments in waste management. Independent from the chosen analytic hierarchy process mode, results provide valuable indications for policy-makers on the application of economic instruments, as well as on their specific strengths and weaknesses. Nevertheless, the instruments need to be put in the country-specific context along with the results of this analytic hierarchy process application before practical decisions are made.
机译:经济手段为市政废物管理绩效低下的国家提供了巨大的潜力,可降低垃圾掩埋率和增加市政废物的回收率。在这项研究中,比较了垃圾填埋税,随付随付的收费系统,押金退款系统和扩展的生产者责任计划的优缺点,重点关注废物管理绩效低的国家的情况。为了优先考虑在这些国家/地区实施的工具,应用层次分析法,将文献综述的结果作为比较的输入。评估显示,考虑到与公用事业相关的标准(w_b = 0.35;层次分析法分配模式;绝对比较),按现收现付是最可取的手段,这主要是由于其具有废物预防效果,紧随其后的是填埋税(w_b = 0.32)。存款退款系统(w_b = 0.17)和生产者扩展责任制(w_b = 0.16)排名第三和第四,由于它们的相似性而具有边际差异。当比较中还包括与成本相关的标准时,垃圾掩埋税似乎提供了最高的公用事业成本比。根据成本(与公用事业相关标准相反)的文献数据目前尚不足以根据公用事业成本比率进行稳健的排名。通常,层次分析法被视为评估废物管理中经济手段的合适方法。结果独立于所选的层次分析过程模式,为决策者提供了有关经济手段的应用以及其优势和劣势的有价值的指示。但是,在做出实际决策之前,需要将工具以及此层次分析法应用的结果放在特定国家的环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号