首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Assessment and comparison of three high-aluminum fly ash utilization scenarios in Inner Mongolia, China using an eco-efficiency indicator
【24h】

Assessment and comparison of three high-aluminum fly ash utilization scenarios in Inner Mongolia, China using an eco-efficiency indicator

机译:利用生态效率指标评估和比较中国内蒙古的三种高铝粉煤灰利用情景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Utilization of fly ash is of great importance in China in the context of resource and environmental crises. Different fly ash utilization processes are proposed, and some have been practically applied. However, none of these fly ash utilization pathways has been evaluated comprehensively by integrating both environmental and economic perspectives. In this study, three high-aluminum fly ash utilization methods in Mongolia were assessed and compared based on the concept of eco-efficiency. The environmental assessment was conducted in accordance with life-cycle assessment principles, and a monetization-weighting approach was applied to obtain social willingness-to-pay as a reflection of environmental impact. The environmental assessment results revealed that the reuse of fly ash had significant advantage for saving primary resource, while solid waste, depletion of water, and global warming were the three highest environmental impacts from the life cycle perspective. The economic performance assessment showed positive net profits for fly ash utilization, but high value-added products were not necessarily indicative of better economic performance due to the relatively high operation cost. Comparison of the eco-efficiency indicators (EEIs) implied that the process of scenario 1#, which produced mullite ceramic and active calcium silicate, was the most recommended out of the three scenarios on the present scale. This judgment was consistent with the evaluation of the resource utilization rate. The present study showed that the EE1 could be used to compare different fly ash utilization processes in a comprehensive and objective manner, thus providing definitive and insightful suggestions for decision-making and technical improvement.
机译:在资源和环境危机的背景下,粉煤灰的利用在中国非常重要。提出了不同的粉煤灰利用方法,并且其中一些已被实际应用。但是,这些飞灰利用途径均未通过综合环境和经济角度进行全面评估。在这项研究中,基于生态效率的概念,评估并比较了蒙古的三种高铝粉煤灰利用方法。根据生命周期评估原则进行环境评估,并采用货币加权法来获得社会支付意愿,以反映对环境的影响。环境评估结果表明,粉煤灰的再利用在节省一次资源方面具有显着优势,而从生命周期的角度来看,固体废物,水的消耗和全球变暖是对环境的三大影响。经济绩效评估显示,粉煤灰利用的净利润为正,但由于较高的运营成本,高附加值产品不一定表示较好的经济绩效。生态效率指标(EEIs)的比较表明,在当前规模的三种方案中,最推荐使用方案1#(生产莫来石陶瓷和活性硅酸钙)的过程。该判断与资源利用率的评价是一致的。本研究表明,EE1可用于以全面,客观的方式比较不同的粉煤灰利用过程,从而为决策和技术改进提供明确而有见地的建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste management & research》 |2017年第5期|515-524|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Resource and Environmental Branch, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, China,Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Management and Environment Safety, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China;

    Resource and Environmental Branch, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, China;

    National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Production Technology of Hydrometallurgy, Institute of Process Engineering, Beijing, China;

    National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Production Technology of Hydrometallurgy, Institute of Process Engineering, Beijing, China;

    Resource and Environmental Branch, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, China;

    Resource and Environmental Branch, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Fly ash utilization; eco-efficiency; environmental impact; life-cycle assessment; economic profit;

    机译:粉煤灰利用;生态效率对环境造成的影响;生命周期评估;经济利润;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:37:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号