首页> 外文期刊>War and Society. >Misleading Paradigms Of War: States And Non-state Actors, Combatants And Non-combatants
【24h】

Misleading Paradigms Of War: States And Non-state Actors, Combatants And Non-combatants

机译:令人误解的战争范例:国家与非国家行为者,战斗人员与非战斗人员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For too long 'war' has been defined and considered in terms of two armed groups of human beings fighting with each other; from the perspective of international law, it has been defined even more narrowly as the violent, organised conflict between sovereign states. Consequently, the United Nations' Security Council hesitated or failed to agree on the need for intervention when ethnic groups started 'ethnically cleansing' each other violently to create ethnically 'pure' areas in Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, when Hutus engaged in a mass killing of Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994, and when Arab started raping and killing non-Arab populations in Darfur in 2003. Even though the UN's 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide engages the Contracting Parties to act to prevent (and punish) any occurrence of genocide, the tendency for states today is still to shirk intervention in the 'internal affairs' of a sovereign state.
机译:长期以来,“战争”是根据两个人类武装团体之间的战斗来定义和考虑的。从国际法的角度来看,它被更狭义地定义为主权国家之间的暴力,有组织的冲突。因此,在1990年代初,Hutus进行大规模杀害时,各族裔开始种族暴力地互相“种族清洗”以在南斯拉夫创建种族“纯净”地区时,联合国安理会犹豫或未能达成共识,是否需要干预。于1994年在卢旺达的图西人(Tutsis)进行,2003年阿拉伯人开始在达尔富尔强奸和杀害非阿拉伯人口。即使联合国1948年的《防止和惩治灭绝种族罪公约》要求缔约方采取行动,以预防(和惩治) )任何种族灭绝的发生,今天的国家仍然倾向于推卸干预主权国家的“内部事务”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号