首页> 外文期刊>USA today >Assessing the Not-So-Great New Deal
【24h】

Assessing the Not-So-Great New Deal

机译:评估不太新的交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"FDR's New Deal Worked. We Need Another One." So said the headline of one of Noah Smith's recent Bloomberg columns. The subheadline adds that "Claims that the programs adopted in the 1930s lengthened the Great Depression don't hold up." For good measure Smith adds that such claims only are encountered "in certain right-wing circles and among a few contrarian economists." Far from being novel, Smith's rhapsodic view of the New Deal represents today's conventional wisdom, hundreds of instances of which might be gathered from the popular press and elsewhere. Here are a few: "Without [Pres. Franklin] Roosevelt's intervention, the economic recovery that lasted from 1933 to 1937 would have been weaker and shorter-not unlike our own recovery after the Great Recession" and "Any who doubt the New Deal's effectiveness need only look at the double-dip recession of 1937, after a conservative backlash in Congress scaled down relief spending." (David Weiman, "Imagining a World Without the New Deal," The Washington Post, Aug. 12,2011).
机译:“FDR的新交易工作。我们需要另一个。”所以说Noah Smith最近的彭博专栏的标题。副标题补充说,“声称在20世纪30年代通过的计划加剧了大萧条不持有。”对于好的衡量标准,史密斯增加了这种索赔,只会在某些右翼圈子和一些逆流经济学中遇到。“史密斯的傲慢看来,新政的傲慢观点代表了今天的传统智慧,其中数百个情况可能会收集来自流行的新闻和其他地方。这里有一些:“没有[富兰克林]罗斯福的干预,从1933年到1937年持续的经济复苏会越来越弱,而不是我们在巨大经济衰退后的恢复不同”和“任何怀疑新的交易的效力只需要看1937年的双重衰退,在国会保守的反弹下降后缩减了救济支出。“ (David Weiman,“想象一个没有新交易的世界,”华盛顿邮报12,2011)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《USA today》 |2020年第2904期|66-75|共10页
  • 作者

    GEORGE SELGIN;

  • 作者单位

    Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives at the Cato Institute Washington D.C.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号