...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban water journal >Assessing productivity changes in water companies: a comparison of the Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators
【24h】

Assessing productivity changes in water companies: a comparison of the Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators

机译:评估自来水公司的生产率变化:Luenberger和Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen生产率指标的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Interest in evaluating productivity changes in water companies has increased in recent years. In this paper, for the first time, we employ the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indicator (LHMPI) to evaluate productivity changes in a sample of Chilean water companies from 2010 to 2016. Productivity change estimations obtained by both the Luenberger Productivity Indicator (LPI) and the LHMPI are compared. Moreover, both indicators were computed assuming constant and variable returns to scale technologies. The LHMPI estimates illustrate that productivity in Chilean water companies has slightly improved over the period studied due to the positive trend of outputs, whereas the inputs negatively contributed to productivity changes. Results from the empirical analysis enabled us to verify that the LHMPI and LPI (and their drivers) are statistically different. This conclusion illustrates that water regulators need to pay attention to the indicators used when assessing productivity changes in water companies.
机译:近年来,对水公司的生产率变化进行评估的兴趣有所增加。在本文中,我们首次使用Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen生产率指标(LHMPI)评估了智利自来水公司2010年至2016年样本中的生产率变化。通过Luenberger生产率指标(LPI)获得的生产率变化估计值)和LHMPI进行比较。此外,这两个指标都是在假定规模技术具有固定收益和可变收益的情况下计算的。 LHMPI估计值表明,由于产出呈积极趋势,智利水务公司的生产率在研究期间有所改善,而投入却对生产率变化产生负面影响。经验分析的结果使我们能够验证LHMPI和LPI(及其驱动因素)在统计上是不同的。该结论表明,水管理者在评估自来水公司生产率变化时需要注意所使用的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号