首页> 外文期刊>Urban water journal >Cost-effectiveness analysis of sewer mining versus centralized wastewater treatment: Case study of the Arga river basin, Spain
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sewer mining versus centralized wastewater treatment: Case study of the Arga river basin, Spain

机译:下水道开采与集中式废水处理的成本效益分析:西班牙阿尔加河流域的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the context of the EU Water Framework Directive, a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment strategies aimed to improve the ecological status of a Spanish river. The implementation of several hybrid membrane bioreactors within the urban framework for sewer mining (SM) was compared with the more common wastewater treatment plant enlargement option. The assessment ranked six alternatives based on 12 potential scenarios, aimed at narrowing the uncertainty of the CEA. The cost analysis illustrated that SM is the most expensive option in regard to both investment and operation and maintenance costs. However, the effectiveness of the alternatives evaluated depends significantly on the scenarios considered, with SM the most effective in most cases. Finally, the cost-effectiveness ratio showed SM as the best cost-effective alternative. CEA provides an ecological-economic indicator useful to prioritize wastewater treatment alternatives to achieve a given objective.
机译:根据欧盟水框架指令,进行了成本效益分析(CEA),以比较旨在改善西班牙河流生态状况的集中式和分散式废水处理策略。比较了城市下水道采矿(SM)框架内几种混合膜生物反应器的实施与更常见的污水处理厂扩建方案。该评估基于12种潜在方案对6种备选方案进行了排名,目的是缩小CEA的不确定性。成本分析表明,就投资以及运营和维护成本而言,SM是最昂贵的选择。但是,所评估的替代方案的有效性在很大程度上取决于所考虑的方案,其中SM在大多数情况下最为有效。最后,成本效益比显示SM是最佳的成本效益选择。 CEA提供了一种生态经济指标,可用于优先处理废水替代方案以实现给定目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号