首页> 外文期刊>Urban water journal >The combined use of resilience and loop diameter uniformity as a good indirect measure of network reliability
【24h】

The combined use of resilience and loop diameter uniformity as a good indirect measure of network reliability

机译:回弹力和环路直径均匀性的组合使用,可作为衡量网络可靠性的良好间接方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this paper is to show that the combined use of the resilience index (Todini, 2000) with a loop based diameter uniformity index (here formulated) yields a good indirect reliability measure, which can be conveniently used within the optimization processes of the water distribution system design. The methodology adopted to show the advantages of the combined use of the two indexes consists of (a) a three-objective optimization performed in order to simultaneously minimize costs (first objective function) and maximize both the resilience and the loop diameter uniformity indexes (second and third objective functions respectively); (b) a retrospective assessment of performance indicators relative to critical operational scenarios on the solutions of the Pareto surface obtained at the end of the optimization process. Applications were performed considering a simple case study, which made it possible to easily compare the new approach, based on a three-objective optimization, with the two-objective optimization process based on the use of the resilience index alone and also with the two-objective optimization process based on the modified resilience index formulated by Prasad, Sung-Hoon, and Namsik (2003) (where the diameter uniformity is defined at nodal level and inserted as a weight in Todini's resilience index), being both indexes a surrogate to reliability. The comparison pointed out that using resilience and loop diameter uniformity as two separate objective functions in an optimization process leads to solutions which perform better during critical operational scenarios (particularly when dealing with segment isolation) than the equally expensive solutions obtained adopting the resilience index (independently of its formulation) alone as reliability related objective function. Since the proposed approach suggests that a three-objective optimization be utilized to perform an appropriate pipe-network optimal design, an improvement in the well-known NSGA-II algorithm (Deb, Pratap, Agarwal, & Meyarivan, 2002) is proposed as its original formulation proved to have some difficulties dealing with more than two objectives.
机译:本文的目的是表明,将回弹指数(Todini,2000)与基于环的直径均匀性指数(在此公式化)结合使用可产生良好的间接可靠性度量,可在优化过程中方便地使用它。供水系统设计。展示两种指标结合使用的优点的方法包括:(a)执行三目标优化,以便同时最小化成本(第一个目标函数)并最大化回弹力和环径均匀性指标(第二个)和第三个目标函数); (b)在优化过程结束时获得的有关帕累托表面解决方案的关键操作方案相关性能指标的回顾性评估。考虑到一个简单的案例研究进行了应用,这使得可以轻松地将基于三目标优化的新方法与基于单独使用弹性指数的二目标优化过程以及两个目标进行比较。基于Prasad,Sung-Hoon和Namsik(2003)(其中直径均匀性定义在节点级别并作为Todini的弹性指数的权重)制定的修改后的弹性指数的客观优化过程。这两个指数都是可靠性的替代指标。比较结果指出,在优化过程中将弹性和环径均匀性用作两个独立的目标函数,所得到的解决方案在关键操作场景下(尤其是在处理段隔离时)的性能要比采用弹性指数获得的同等成本的解决方案(独立其公式化)作为可靠性相关的目标函数。由于建议的方法建议利用三目标优化来执行适当的管网优化设计,因此提出了对著名的NSGA-II算法(Deb,Pratap,Agarwal和Meyarivan,2002)的改进。事实证明,原始表述在处理两个以上目标方面有些困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号