首页> 外文期刊>Urban water journal >Evaluating the SWMM LID Editor rain barrel option for the estimation of retention potential of rainwater harvesting systems
【24h】

Evaluating the SWMM LID Editor rain barrel option for the estimation of retention potential of rainwater harvesting systems

机译:评估SWMML LID编辑器雨桶选项以估计雨水收集系统的保留潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The low-impact development (LID) Editor rain barrel option of release 5.5 of the EPA storm water management model (SWMM) software does not allow the consideration of demand-driven behaviour of domestic rain water harvesting (RWH) systems to evaluate their runoff retention potential. This paper compares the results of the LID Editor with those obtained by a detailed demand-driven tank model scheme - used as a benchmark - and developed using basic functions of SWMM. The comparison showed the LID Editor-based model to generally overestimate the benchmark model in the evaluation of both volumetric and peak retention efficiency. The high variability of the results of the comparison suggests the use of the LID Editor rain barrel option for long-term simulation but not for single event analysis. A sensitivity analysis revealed that the overestimation provided by the rain barrel option is significant for tanks smaller than 2m(3), tank sizes of major diffusion for domestic RWH.
机译:EPA雨水管理模型(SWMM)软件5.5版的低影响开发(LID)编辑器雨桶选项不允许考虑家用雨水收集(RWH)系统的需求驱动行为来评估其径流保持能力潜在。本文将LID编辑器的结果与通过详细需求驱动的油箱模型方案(用作基准)并使用SWMM的基本功能开发的结果进行了比较。比较结果表明,基于LID编辑器的模型通常在评估体积和峰保留效率方面都高估了基准模型。比较结果的高度可变性表明,将LID Editor雨桶选项用于长期仿真,而不是用于单个事件分析。敏感性分析表明,对于小于2m(3)的储罐,雨桶选项提供的高估是显着的,对于家用RWH,储罐的主要扩散尺寸较大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号