首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Comparing Responses to Ethnic Segregation in Urban Europe
【24h】

Comparing Responses to Ethnic Segregation in Urban Europe

机译:比较欧洲城市对种族隔离的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Urban ethnic segregation varies across and within European countries. Segregation is decried by many scholars and policy-makers, accepted by others and ignored by some. A most-similar-case comparison of three national and six local German, Dutch and Belgian cases between the mid 1970s and the early 2000s demonstrates that authorities differed on how they viewed and reacted to the segregation of migrant and migrant-origin residents. Their disparate responses stemmed not from actual levels of segregation but from differences in the ways that segregation was conceived, in the emphases given to broader structural or political-cultural integration policies and in the degree to which they provoked or defused ethnic conflict and anti-migrant political mobilisation. Everywhere, attempts to combat segregation gradually gave way to-or at least made room for-efforts to mitigate the undesirable social costs associated with them.
机译:在欧洲国家之间和内部,城市种族隔离有所不同。种族隔离是许多学者和政策制定者所决定的,被其他人所接受,而被某些人所忽视。在1970年代中期至2000年代初期,对三个国家案例和六个德国,荷兰和比利时本地案例进行了最类似的比较,结果表明,当局对移民和移民居民隔离的看法和反应方式各不相同。他们的不同回应并非源于实际的种族隔离水平,而是种族隔离的构想方式上的差异,对更广泛的结构或政治文化融合政策的重视以及他们在何种程度上激怒或消除了种族冲突和反移民政治动员。在任何地方,消除种族隔离的努力逐渐让位于-或至少为减轻与之相关的不希望的社会成本而做出的努力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urban Studies》 |2008年第7期|p.1333-1358|共26页
  • 作者

    Patrick Ireland;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Social Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3301 S., Dearborn Street, SH 116, Chicago, IL 60616, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:29:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号