首页> 外文期刊>Urban research & practice >Participatory research and planning in practice
【24h】

Participatory research and planning in practice

机译:参与性研究与规划实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Participatory practices are both necessary and demanded in contemporary domains of politics, governance and policy making. Participation acts as a corrective to or redirection of the power dynamics that shape the neoliberal and post-democratic tendencies inflected in these domains. Participatory Research and Planning in Practice provides insight into how participation can be enacted in ways that are concrete, meaningful and productive. The volume is comprised of 13 chapters in which specific examples and methods of participatory research and planning are examined to reveal their methodological diversity, impact and opportunities for improvement. The three related themes of power, theory and process are woven through the book chapters. Practices and disciplines of power are challenged by and in participatory processes. In examining power and politics through the lens of practice, several of the papers point to a dearth of participatory work due to consultation path dependence through which public institutions and participants can be controlled. Participation is rarely, if ever, a leveller that seeds the ground for equity and justice but a contest in which voices can compete to be heard. Authors point to the state of practice in policy domains such as a transport, housing, natural resource management, conservation and heritage, finding platforms that range from enabling alternative politics to affirming existing power relations. Politics and policy emerge in relation to the capabilities and capacities of institutional arrangements to implement participatory processes and understand the role of actors in them. As an instrumental approach to participation prevails in government entities, actor agency in participatory governance establishes accountability and legitimacy. As many of the authors attest, while participation is political, it is not an event in which community or consensus is easily enacted through one-off public meetings and workshops.
机译:在当代政治,治理和政策制定域名中,参与性做法都是必要的,并要求。参与作为纠正或重定向的权力动力学,这些动力动态形状,这些域中的新自由主义和民主倾向倾向形成。实践中的参与式研究和规划提供了深入了解如何以具体,有意义和生产力的方式制定参与。该体积由13章组成,其中研究了参与性研究和规划的具体实例和方法,以揭示其方法论多样性,影响和改善机会。三个相关的权力,理论和过程主题通过书章节编织。权力的实践和学科受到参与进程的挑战。在通过实践镜头检查权力和政治时,由于可以控制公共机构和参与者的咨询路径依赖,其中几个论文指出了参与性工作的缺乏。如果有的话,参与是一个种子股权和正义的理由,而是一场比赛可以在竞争中被竞争的比赛。作者指出了策略领域的实践状态,如运输,住房,自然资源管理,保护和遗产,寻找范围的平台,从而实现替代政治以肯定现有的电力关系。政治和政策涉及机构安排的能力和能力,以实施参与进程,并了解他们在其中的作用。作为参与的乐器方法在政府实体中,参与性治理的演员机构建立了问责制和合法性。由于许多作者证明,而参与是政治,则不是一个通过一次性公开会议和研讨会轻松颁布社区或共识的活动。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urban research & practice》 |2021年第1期|107-109|共3页
  • 作者

    Linda Carroli;

  • 作者单位

    School of Built Environment Faculty of Science and Engineering QUT Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号