首页> 外文期刊>Urban research & practice >Area-based initiatives and urban dynamics. The case of the Porto city centre
【24h】

Area-based initiatives and urban dynamics. The case of the Porto city centre

机译:基于区域的计划和城市动态。波尔图市中心的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In face of the systemic character of urban problems and the uncertainty surrounding planning methodologies, the need to intervene in urban space requires a holistic and spatial-based approach, rather than simply attempting to regulate urban expansion. Such an approach has increasingly been used in restricted areas to deal with complex urban dynamics and conflicting interests. This area-based and multi-problem approach in urbanism, although not new, has gained new relevance as it is highly relevant to the urban competition between cities (and the 'creative cities' agenda) and is specially suited to deal with the transformation of urban areas with high regenerative potential. It is also easily associated with public-private partnership and the creation of the 'atmospheres' that seem to fit conveniently with the dominant expectations and interests of educated middle- and high-class residents and visitors. In this context, Porto, its city centre and its older heritage area in particular, has provided a very good basis for analysing and discussing the dynamics, intentions and results of area-based initiatives. This is particularly so given the persistence of a range of problems previously commonly found in other cities in Europe some decades which coexist with the dynamics that characterize the larger metropolis where there is a rich recent history of spatial planning in central areas. This article examines what may be described as Europeanization of Porto (and Portuguese) urban policy, and the associated different programmes, projects and plans, providing indications of the agents, processes and results, of what we see as a late and brutal process of transition from public action, or strongly regulated private action, to a dominant private, public-supported urbanism, where social objectives matter much less than aesthetics and 'spatial-based vitality', and urbanism seems to create new divides and increased spatial injustice.
机译:面对城市问题的系统性和规划方法的不确定性,干预城市空间的需求需要采取一种整体的,基于空间的方法,而不是简单地试图规范城市的扩张。在限制地区越来越多地使用这种方法来处理复杂的城市动态和利益冲突。这种在城市主义中基于区域和多问题的方法虽然不是新事物,但由于它与城市之间的城市竞争(以及“创意城市”议程)高度相关,并且特别适合应对城市化的转型,因此具有新的意义。具有高再生潜力的城市地区。它也很容易与公私合作伙伴关系和“氛围”的建立联系在一起,似乎与受过教育的中高阶层居民和游客的主要期望和利益相吻合。在这种情况下,波尔图,其市中心,尤其是其较古老的遗产地区,为分析和讨论基于地区的计划的动态,意图和结果提供了很好的基础。鉴于过去几十年来在欧洲其他城市普遍存在的一系列问题的存在,这种问题尤其如此,这种问题与代表大都市的动态并存,大都市在中部地区拥有丰富的空间规划历史。本文研究了可以被描述为波尔图(和葡萄牙)城市政策的欧洲化以及相关的不同计划,项目和计划,提供了推动者,过程和结果的指示,我们认为这是一个晚期而残酷的过渡过程从公共行动或受严格管制的私人行动,到占主导地位的私人,公共支持的城市主义,其社会目标的重要性远不止美学和“基于空间的生命力”,而城市主义似乎创造了新的鸿沟,并加剧了空间不公。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号