首页> 外文期刊>Urban research & practice >Going too far in the battle against concentration? On the balance between supply and demand of social housing in Dutch cities
【24h】

Going too far in the battle against concentration? On the balance between supply and demand of social housing in Dutch cities

机译:在与集中力的斗争中走得太远了吗?荷兰城市社会住房供求平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the second half of the 1990s, Dutch urban housing policy shifted from urban renewal to urban restructuring and the creation of more socially mixed neighbourhoods. Motives for restructuring stem from the ongoing debates on concentration, segregation and social mix. Here, we focus on the main instruments of urban restructuring, that is, the demolition of social housing and the construction of more expensive rental and owner-occupied housing. Continued restructuring may eventually lead to a shortage of social rented dwellings for low-income households, the target group of social housing. An important political question is therefore whether the dwindling supply of social housing still matches the potential demand in the target group. We addressed this question with an analysis of three Dutch cities: Rotterdam, The Hague and Breda. The results indicate that, although demolition has brought about substantial changes, the share of social rented housing remains high in most restructuring neighbourhoods and restructuring has not resulted in concentrations of social rented housing in other, non-restructuring neighbourhoods in any of the three cities. In Rotterdam, which had a very large social housing stock at the beginning of the restructuring operation, there are still sufficient affordable homes for lower income households. However, in The Hague and Breda, restructuring has tightened the supply of social rental housing. The municipal authority in The Hague has attempted to remedy the situation by entering regional agreements to secure sufficient levels of affordable housing.
机译:在1990年代下半叶,荷兰的城市住房政策从城市更新转向城市结构调整,并建立了更多由社会混合居住的社区。进行重组的动机源于有关集中,隔离和社会融合的持续辩论。在这里,我们集中于城市结构调整的主要手段,即拆除社会住房以及建造更昂贵的租金和自有住房。持续的结构调整最终可能导致低收入家庭(社会住房的目标群体)的社会出租住房短缺。因此,一个重要的政治问题是,社会住房供应的减少是否仍与目标群体的潜在需求相符。我们通过分析三个荷兰城市来解决这个问题:鹿特丹,海牙和布雷达。结果表明,尽管拆迁带来了实质性的变化,但在大多数改组社区中,社会出租住房所占比例仍然很高,而改组并未导致这三个城市中其他非改建社区中社会出租住房的集中。在重组开始之初,社会住房存量很大的鹿特丹,仍然有足够的负担得起的住房供低收入家庭使用。但是,在海牙和布雷达,结构调整使社会出租房屋的供应收紧。海牙市政当局试图通过签订区域协议以确保足够水平的负担得起的住房来纠正这种情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urban research & practice》 |2012年第2期|p.273-283|共11页
  • 作者

    Kees Dol; Reinout Kleinhans;

  • 作者单位

    OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5030,2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;

    OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5030,2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    urban renewal; low-income concentration; social housing;

    机译:市区重建;低收入集中度;公益住房;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:36:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号