首页> 外文期刊>Urban forum >'Where Art Thou?': Ethnocracy, Toponymic Silence, and Toponymic Subjugation in the Harare Commemorative Landscapes During the Mugabe Era (1980-2017)
【24h】

'Where Art Thou?': Ethnocracy, Toponymic Silence, and Toponymic Subjugation in the Harare Commemorative Landscapes During the Mugabe Era (1980-2017)

机译:“你艺术?”:民族纪念,名单的沉默和穆拉巴时代的哈拉雷纪念景观中的名单征服(1980-2017)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the post-colonial national identity formation using place names that commemorate the nation's past in Zimbabwe. Place name alterations that the new political elites implemented at independence in 1980 were aimed at disassembling relics of the deposed regime and craft a new national identity. The commemorative landscapes of Harare, as a national capital, constitute a strategic medium in the constitution of national identity. Ethnicity dominated the political landscape in Zimbabwe. The two main political parties, the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) and Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU), have been aligned with the two supertribes, Shona and Ndebele, respectively. The article explores how the ruling ZANU (PF) government whose leadership was largely Shona used a meta-narrative modelled around discourses of exclusionary autochthony and a partial presentation of the liberation war history that projected ZAPU as having made an insignificant contribution to the liberation war to construct a national identity. It concludes that the use of exclusionary definitions of belonging and a one-sided presentation of the war past that projected ZANU as having contributed more to the liberation war entrenched Shona ethnic chauvinistic tendencies and propagated ZANU (PF) political hegemony. Using the theoretical lens of critical toponymy, the article argues that politically motivated place renaming efforts usually select from the past aspects that serve present political purposes.
机译:本文探讨了使用纪念全国过去在津巴布韦的地方的殖民地国家身份形成。在1980年独立实施的新政治精英的名称改变旨在拆卸所吸引制度的遗物,并制定新的民族认同。作为国家首都的骚扰纪念景观构成了民族认同的战略媒介。种族在津巴布韦占据了政治景观。这两个主要的政党,津巴布韦非洲国家联盟(Zanu)和津巴布韦非洲人民国联盟(ZAPU)分别与两位超级,肖纳和Ndebele一致。文章探讨了统治ZANU(PF)政府在主要原因的政府在大小写的情况下使用了一个围绕排除的自动化和解战争历史的部分陈述,以预测ZAPU对解放战争作出了微不足道的贡献。构建民族认同。结论是,使用归属的排他性定义和战争的片面介绍,将Zanu预测为解放战争创造了更加解放战争的雪原族赤道主义倾向和传播Zanu(PF)政治霸权。使用批判性Topymony的理论镜头,该文章认为,政治动机的地方重命名努力通常从过去的方面进行选择,这些方面是提供目前政治目的的过去方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号