首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Defending Gentrification as a Valid Collective Conception: Utilizing the Metanarrative of 'Suburbia' as a Common Axis for the Diversity of Middle-Class Reurbanization Projects
【24h】

Defending Gentrification as a Valid Collective Conception: Utilizing the Metanarrative of 'Suburbia' as a Common Axis for the Diversity of Middle-Class Reurbanization Projects

机译:捍卫绅士化是一种有效的集体观念:利用“郊区”的叙事作为中产阶级再城镇化项目多样性的共同轴心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A long-standing problem in gentrification research is the increasingly diverse array of interests and agendas in the renewal of the inner city; their diversity has frustrated many scholars with respect to the collective characterization and comprehension of the phenomenon. Consequently, others have questioned the validity of the term "gentrification" itself. This article contends that gentrification is a phenomenon that merits being collectively identified. The relocation of the middle class to the urban core has been portrayed in terms of actors and agendas, places and processes. These criteria have long since been inadequate to collectively rationalize gentrification in anything other than strictly spatial terms. But when suburbia is perceived as a metanarrative, the collective character of gentrification becomes evident; for it is the process of the metanarrative's systemic erosion in the postmodern era that serves the long-standing desire to find an operant commonality to gentrification's apparent lack of coherence.
机译:高档化研究中的一个长期问题是,更新内城的兴趣和议程越来越多样化。它们的多样性使许多学者对这种现象的集体特征和理解感到沮丧。因此,其他人质疑“高级化”一词本身的有效性。本文认为,高档化是一种值得集体认同的现象。从参与者,议程,地点和过程等方面描绘了中产阶级向城市核心的重新安置。长期以来,这些标准不足以用严格的空间术语以外的任何方式来使绅士化集体化。但是当郊区被看作是一种叙事时,高级化的集体特征就变得明显了。因为是后现代时代元叙事的系统性侵蚀的过程,长期以来一直为寻找绅士化明显缺乏连贯性的运作共性提供了渴望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号