首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Why Shrinking Cities Are Not Mirror Images of Growing Cities: A Research Agenda of Six Testable Propositions
【24h】

Why Shrinking Cities Are Not Mirror Images of Growing Cities: A Research Agenda of Six Testable Propositions

机译:萎缩的城市为何与增长中的城市不成镜像:六个可验证命题的研究议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I advance six propositions regarding the features of urban decline processes that distinguish them from those in growing cities. First, they are demographically selective , as population losses are disproportionately comprised of more advantaged households. Second, they are dynamically nonlinear , as population changes exceed thresholds where socially problematic behaviors and residential disinvestment jump sharply. Third, they are asymmetrically scalable for technological, financial, physical, and political reasons. Fourth, they are minimally controlled by traditional land-use policies of zoning and building permits. Fifth, they are informally decentralized , as individuals and groups supplement the atrophied local public sector with “do it yourself” activities. Sixth, they are psychologically conservative , as residents try to conserve threatened physical, social, and psychological resources. The article synthesizes extant theory and evidence from multiple disciplines, although ultimately the propositions are advanced as working hypotheses commanding varying degrees of support, which collectively comprise a research agenda for further investigation.
机译:我提出了关于城市衰退过程特征的六个命题,这些特征将其与成长中的城市区分开来。首先,他们在人口统计学上是有选择性的,因为人口流失由比例更高的家庭构成。其次,它们是动态非线性的,因为人口变化超过了社会问题行为和住宅投资急剧增加的阈值。第三,由于技术,财务,物理和政治原因,它们是非对称可伸缩的。第四,它们受到分区和建筑许可的传统土地使用政策的最小控制。第五,他们是非正式的权力下放,因为个人和团体通过“自己动手”活动补充了萎缩的地方公共部门。第六,他们在心理上比较保守,因为居民试图保护受威胁的身体,社会和心理资源。这篇文章综合了来自多个学科的现存理论和证据,尽管最终这些命题是作为可以支持不同程度支持的工作假设而提出的,这些假设共同构成了进一步研究的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号