【24h】

Deconstructing Navy Inc.

机译:解构海军公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 21st-century Navy has taken the inherent efficacy of operational contract support (OCS) over sailors' labor as a sacred truth. The more services we can contract out, the more "flexible" and "cost-efficient" we are. But we have not paused to examine the leviathan we have created. There have been far too few studies providing long-term cost-benefit analyses of hiring a legion of contractors rather than retaining a legion of service members. We have evolved into the hybrid military-contractor government body "Navy Inc." Fully 10 percent of the U.S. federal budget is now awarded to military contractors. The contractor component is strong, both as lobbyists in Washington, D.C., and as determinants of the Fleet's battle readiness. As we enter an increasingly perilous fiscal environment, all signs point to the Fleet doubling down on contracting out critical services as a financial necessity-but should we?
机译:21世纪的海军已经将作战合同支持(OCS)的固有效力视为水手的劳动,这是神圣的真理。我们可以外包的服务越多,我们就越“灵活”和“具有成本效益”。但是我们并没有停下来研究我们创造的leviathan。很少有研究提供长期成本效益分析,即雇用大量承包商而不是保留大量服务成员。我们已经发展成为混合型军事承包商政府机构“海军公司”。现在,美国联邦预算的全部10%被授予军事承包商。承包商的组成部分很强大,既是华盛顿特区的游说者,又是舰队战备状态的决定因素。随着我们进入一个日益危险的财政环境,所有迹象都表明,舰队加倍将承包重要服务外包为财务上的必需品,但我们应该这样做吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号