首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Organized Crime >Organized criminal involvement in the illicit antiquities trade
【24h】

Organized criminal involvement in the illicit antiquities trade

机译:有组织的犯罪参与非法古物交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From the ”glocal” perspective of a large sample of archaeologists conducting fieldwork throughout the world and working on the very sites of interest to looters, this paper explores the question whether and to what extent organized crime is involved in the theft and illicit export of archaeological resources. Two major findings are presented: first, archaeologists tend almost unanimously to consider that organized crime operates within the ‘global’ antiquities market, but when asked about their own personal experiences with looting on the sites where they work, many fewer report observations of organized crime; second, however, it is apparent that respondents’ conceptions of “organized crime” involve media-driven, stereotypical representations of mafia-style structures. Therefore, although in their reporting of observed local activities they do not provide substantial survey evidence of the presence of organized crime so defined, they do report appreciable “organization” among those who have looted their sites—which, again, they have almost unanimously experienced. This paper considers the implications of such findings for both the definitional debate on organized crime and the academic analysis of the trade in looted antiquities.
机译:从大量考古学家在全球范围内开展实地调查并在掠夺者感兴趣的现场工作的“全球性”角度出发,本文探讨了有组织犯罪是否在何种程度上参与了盗窃和非法出口考古学的问题资源。提出了两个主要发现:首先,考古学家倾向于一致认为有组织犯罪是在“全球”古物市场中进行的,但是当被问及他们在工作地点掠夺自己的亲身经历时,报告有组织犯罪的观察结果的人就更少了。 ;其次,很明显,受访者对“有组织犯罪”的概念涉及媒体驱动的黑手党式结构的刻板印象。因此,尽管他们在报告所观察到的当地活动时并未提供实质性的调查证据以证明存在如此定义的有组织犯罪,但他们确实报告了洗劫地点的人中有明显的“组织”,这些人再次经历了几乎一致的经历。 。本文考虑了这些发现对于有组织犯罪的定义辩论以及对被掠夺古物交易的学术分析的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号