首页> 外文期刊>TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE >Incorporating Network Flow Effects into the Airline Fleet Assignment Process
【24h】

Incorporating Network Flow Effects into the Airline Fleet Assignment Process

机译:将网络流量影响纳入航空公司机队分配过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a new methodology for incorporating origin and destination (O&D) network effects into the fleet assignment process. The methodology uses a decomposition strategy to combine a modified version of a leg-based fleet assignment model (Leg-FAM) with the network flow aspects of probabilistic O&D yield management. By decomposing the problem, the nonlinear aspects of the O&D market effects and passenger flow are isolated in O&D yield management and incorporated in FAM using linear approximations to the total network revenue function. To illustrate this methodology and its economic benefits, an example consisting of 10 cities, 48 flight legs, and 534 O&D market classes is presented and compared to the results found using two commonly used Leg-FAM formulations. nnTo benchmark the benefits of using an O&D approach to fleet assignment, we present two case studies comparing the Leg-FAM and O&D FAM approaches using actual airline schedules with more than 4,000 daily operations. For these benchmarks, we present the results of a general fleet assignment process in which all the scheduled flights must be assigned an aircraft type and a schedule reduction run in which nonprofitable flights can be cancelled. nnThe methodology presented in this paper is ideally suited for demand-driven dispatch (D3) scenarios, where near-term fleeting changes are made to better match O&D passenger demand to available aircraft capacity. To illustrate the use of the O&D FAM methodology to facilitate near-term refleeting process, we present results from implementing a D3 process using O&D FAM at AMR's American Eagle Airlines.
机译:本文提出了一种将始发地和目的地(O&D)网络效应纳入车队分配过程的新方法。该方法使用分解策略,将基于支腿的车队分配模型(Leg-FAM)的修改版本与概率O&D收益管理的网络流方面相结合。通过分解问题,可以将O&D市场影响和客流的非线性方面隔离在O&D收益管理中,并使用对总网络收入函数的线性近似将其并入FAM。为了说明这种方法及其经济利益,给出了一个由10个城市,48个航段和534个O&D市场类别组成的示例,并将其与使用两种常用的Leg-FAM公式得出的结果进行了比较。 nn为了对使用O&D方法进行机队分配的收益进行基准测试,我们提供了两个案例研究,将Leg-FAM和O&D FAM方法使用实际的航班时刻表进行了比较,每天有4,000多次航班。对于这些基准,我们介绍了一般机队分配过程的结果,在该过程中,必须为所有计划的航班分配飞机类型,并执行计划缩减运行,在此过程中,可以取消无利可图的航班。 nn本文介绍的方法非常适合需求驱动的调度(D3)场景,在这种情况下,需要进行短期机队变更,以更好地将O&D乘客需求与可用飞机容量相匹配。为了说明使用O&D FAM方法来促进近期再造过程的过程,我们介绍了在AMR的American Eagle Airlines使用O&D FAM实施D3过程的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号