首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation - Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment
【24h】

Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation - Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment

机译:次要任务参与和车辆自动化-在道路实验中比较不同自动化水平的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent and upcoming advances in vehicle automation are likely to change the role of the driver from one of actively controlling a vehicle to one of monitoring the behaviour of an assistant system and the traffic environment. A growing body of literature suggests that one possible side effect of an increase in the degree of vehicle automation is the tendency of drivers to become more heavily involved in secondary tasks while the vehicle is in motion. However, these studies have mainly been conducted in strictly controlled research environments, such as driving simulators and test tracks, and have mainly involved either low levels of automation (i.e., automation of longitudinal control by Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)) or Highly automated driving (i.e., automation of both longitudinal and lateral control without the need for continuous monitoring). This study aims to replicate these effects during an on-road experiment in everyday traffic and to extend previous findings to an intermediate level of automation, in which both longitudinal and lateral control are automated but the driver must still monitor the traffic environment continuously (so-called Partial automation). N = 32 participants of different age groups and different levels of familiarity with ACC drove in rush-hour traffic on a highway segment. They were assisted by ACC, ACC with steering assistance (ACC+SA), or not at all. The results show that while subjective and objective driving safety were not influenced by the degree of automation, drivers who were already familiar with ACC increased the frequency of interactions with an in-vehicle secondary task in both assisted drives. However, participants generally rated performing the secondary task as less effortful when being assisted, regardless of the automation level (ACC vs. ACC+SA). The results of this on-road experiment thus validate previous findings from more-controlled research environments and extend them to Partially automated driving. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:车辆自动化中的最新和即将出现的进步很可能将驾驶员的角色从主动控制车辆的一种变为监视辅助系统的行为和交通环境的一种。越来越多的文献表明,车辆自动化程度提高的一个可能的副作用是,驾驶员在车辆行驶时倾向于更多地参与次要任务。但是,这些研究主要在严格受控的研究环境中进行,例如驾驶模拟器和测试轨道,并且主要涉及低水平的自动化(即通过自适应巡航控制(ACC)进行纵向控制的自动化)或高度自动化的驾驶。 (即,纵向和横向控制的自动化,而无需持续监控)。这项研究旨在在日常交通的道路实验中复制这些影响,并将以前的发现扩展到自动化的中间水平,在该水平上,纵向和横向控制都是自动化的,但驾驶员仍必须连续监控交通环境(因此,称为部分自动化)。 N = 32个不同年龄段的参与者和对ACC的不同了解程度导致高速公路段的高峰时间交通。他们得到了ACC,ACC的转向帮助(ACC + SA)的帮助,或者根本没有帮助。结果表明,虽然主观和客观驾驶的安全性不受自动化程度的影响,但已经熟悉ACC的驾驶员在两种辅助驾驶中都增加了与车载辅助任务交互的频率。但是,无论自动化级别如何(ACC与ACC + SA),参与者通常都认为在获得辅助时执行次要任务不那么费力。因此,该道路实验的结果验证了来自受控程度更高的研究环境中的先前发现,并将其扩展到部分自动驾驶。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号