首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Electric vehicle users and their travel patterns in Greater Stockholm
【24h】

Electric vehicle users and their travel patterns in Greater Stockholm

机译:大斯德哥尔摩的电动汽车用户及其出行方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electric vehicles (EVs) show promise for improving the environmental sustainability of the transport system since, as opposed to conventional vehicles, they have no tailpipe exhaust gas emissions. The use of EVs can also decrease the amount of greenhouse gas emissions, especially if the electricity has been generated with renewable energy sources. However, the scale of projected benefits can be questioned since the travel patterns of car drivers may not stay the same after changing to EVs, due to various factors such as higher investment costs, lower operation costs and general perceptions associated with electric vehicles. In this study, the travel patterns of both electric vehicle users and conventional vehicle users in Greater Stockholm are compared with regard to the number of trips made and the modal share of the car in the total travel distance. For this purpose, a one-day travel diary carried out in autumn 2014 has been used. The main findings are the following: firstly, the EV is generally perceived by respondents to be more environmentally friendly than public transport modes. Secondly, EV users make significantly more trips than their non-EV using counterparts, according to their one-day travel diaries and controlling for socio-economic and situational variables. Thirdly, EV users choose the car for a significantly larger percentage of their total travel distance than conventional vehicle users. Those observations would suggest a rebound effect, as EVs still consume a considerable amount of energy and contribute to other external effects such as congestion. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:电动汽车(EV)有望改善交通运输系统的环境可持续性,因为与传统汽车相比,电动汽车不排放尾气。电动汽车的使用还可以减少温室气体的排放量,特别是如果使用可再生能源发电。但是,由于各种因素(例如更高的投资成本,更低的运营成本和与电动汽车相关的普遍看法),在换用电动汽车后汽车驾驶员的出行方式可能不会保持不变,因此预计收益的规模可能会受到质疑。在这项研究中,比较了大斯德哥尔摩地区电动汽车用户和传统汽车用户的出行方式,包括出行次数和在总出行距离中汽车的模态份额。为此,使用了2014年秋天进行的一日旅行日记。主要发现如下:首先,受访者普遍认为电动汽车比公共交通方式更环保。其次,根据他们的一日游日记并控制社会经济和状况变量,电动汽车用户的旅行比非电动汽车用户多得多。第三,电动汽车用户选择汽车的总行驶距离所占比例比传统汽车用户高得多。这些观察结果表明存在反弹效应,因为电动汽车仍然消耗大量能量,并导致其他外部影响,例如交通拥堵。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号