Hi'/> Population exposure to road traffic noise: Experimental results from varying exposure estimation approaches
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Population exposure to road traffic noise: Experimental results from varying exposure estimation approaches
【24h】

Population exposure to road traffic noise: Experimental results from varying exposure estimation approaches

机译:人口暴露于道路交通噪声中:各种暴露估计方法的实验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HighlightsWe assess methods for estimating population exposure to road traffic noise.We employ an urban case study using Ldenand Lnightnoise indicators.Population exposure differs depending on the estimation method employed.Method of noise calculation also effects exposure estimates, but less for Lnight.A standardized exposure estimation model is needed for comparability.AbstractThis paper assesses four methods for estimating population exposure to road traffic noise within the terms of the strategic noise mapping process laid down in the Environmental Noise Directive (END). Employing a case study in central Dublin, Ireland, the methods – MAX, MIN, VBEB/CNOSSOS and AVE – are tested utilising the Ldenand Lnightindicators. The study first investigates the extent to which exposure estimates may vary depending on the method utilised while controlling for the noise calculation method. Second, it investigates how estimates of exposure vary depending on the calculation method used; in this case, CRTN and NMPB. The results show that controlling for noise calculation method and employing the same input data, estimations of population exposure differ substantially depending on the exposure method employed. Furthermore, the potential variability in estimated night-time exposure and the potential for under or over-estimation of the health effects of environmental noise on a given population when different methods are utilised is clearly demonstrated. The results also show that the method of noise calculation employed has an effect on estimated exposure, particularly for Ldenmeasures. Values for Lnightwere found to be very similar regardless of the calculation method employed. The results therefore suggest that it is the exposure estimation method rather than the noise calculation method which has the greatest effect on population exposure estimation and should therefore be of greatest concern for understanding population health impacts and for achieving consistent results.
机译: 突出显示 我们评估了估计人口受到道路交通噪声影响的方法。 < ce:list-item id =“ o0010”> 我们采用了使用L den 和L 夜晚噪声指标。 < ce:list-item id =“ o0015”> 人口暴露因所采用的估算方法而异。 噪声校准方法计算也会影响暴露量估算值,但对L 晚上的影响较小。 需要一个标准化的暴露估算模型才能实现可比性。 摘要 本文根据《环境噪声指令》(END)规定的战略性噪声映射过程,评估了四种估计人口受到道路交通噪声影响的方法。通过在爱尔兰都柏林中部进行的案例研究,使用L den 和L 晚上指示器。这项研究首先调查了暴露估计的变化程度,具体取决于控制噪声计算方法时所使用的方法。其次,研究暴露估计如何根据所使用的计算方法而变化;在这种情况下,为CRTN和NMPB。结果表明,对于噪声计算方法进行控制并使用相同的输入数据,根据所使用的曝光方法,人口暴露的估计值会有很大不同。此外,当使用不同方法时,清楚地证明了夜间估计暴露的潜在变异性以及环境噪声对给定人群的健康影响的低估或高估潜力。结果还表明,所采用的噪声计算方法对估计的曝光量有影响,尤其是对于L den 措施。无论使用哪种计算方法,L 夜晚的值都非常相似。因此,结果表明,对人群暴露估计影响最大的是暴露估计方法,而不是噪声计算方法,因此应该最关注关注了解人群健康影响并取得一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号