...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Why do urban travelers select multimodal travel options: A repertory grid analysis
【24h】

Why do urban travelers select multimodal travel options: A repertory grid analysis

机译:为什么城市旅行者选择多式联运选择:储物格分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The increasing number of travelers in urban areas has led to new opportunities for local government and private mobility providers to offer new travel modes besides and in addition to traditional ones. Multimodal travel provides an especially promising opportunity. However, until now the underlying reasons why consumers choose specific alternatives have not been fully understood. Hence, the design of new travel modes is mainly driven by obvious criteria such as environmental friendliness and convenience but might not consider consumers' real or latent needs. To close this research gap, sixty in-depth interviews with urban travelers were conducted. To identify the perceptual differences of customers among different travel modes, the repertory grid technique as an innovative, structured interview method was applied. Our data show that urban travelers distinguish and select travel alternatives based on 28 perceptual determinants. While some determinants associated with private cars such as privacy, flexibility and autonomy are key indicators of travel mode choice, costs and time efficiency also play a major role. Furthermore, by comparing travel modes to an ideal category, we reveal that some perceptual determinants do not need to be maximized in order to fulfill customer needs optimally. A comparison of consumers' perceptual assessments of alternative travel modes identifies specific advantages and disadvantages of all alternatives, and provides fruitful implications for government and private mobility providers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:城市地区越来越多的旅行者为地方政府和私人出行提供了新的机会,以提供除传统旅行方式之外的其他旅行方式。多式联运提供了特别有希望的机会。但是,到目前为止,消费者选择特定替代品的根本原因尚未完全了解。因此,新的出行方式的设计主要由明显的标准(例如环境友好性和便利性)驱动,但可能没有考虑消费者的实际或潜在需求。为了弥补这一研究空白,对城市旅客进行了六十次深度访谈。为了识别不同出行方式之间客户的感知差异,应用了储备格技术作为一种创新的,结构化的访谈方法。我们的数据表明,城市旅客会根据28个感知因素来区分和选择其他出行方式。虽然与私家车相关的一些决定因素(例如隐私,灵活性和自主性)是出行方式选择的关键指标,但成本和时间效率也起着重要作用。此外,通过将出行方式与理想类别进行比较,我们发现,为了最大化地满足客户需求,不需要将某些感知决定因素最大化。消费者对替代出行方式的感知评估的比较确定了所有替代出行方式的特定优势和劣势,并为政府和私人出行提供者带来了丰硕的启示。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号