首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Estimating policy values for in-vehicle comfort and crowding reduction in local public transport
【24h】

Estimating policy values for in-vehicle comfort and crowding reduction in local public transport

机译:估算车内舒适度和减少当地公共交通拥挤的政策价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study estimates policy values for comfort, defined as getting a seat, and crowding reduction on board local public transport in Sweden. We use stated-preference (SP) data and present crowding as a mode-neutral crowding level among the standing travelers depicted in images presented to the respondents. We analyze whether there are differences in the willingness to pay (WTP) for comfort and crowding reduction among the three largest urban areas in Sweden. In general, we find no significantly different preferences for sitting and crowding reduction among the three urban areas. Still, the point estimates differ in some cases, indicating that there may be differences across the three urban areas, but the estimates have large confidence intervals that overlap each other. Also, these differences are likely to have resulted from mode-share differences and not from differences in preferences across the urban areas. Some significant differences are found among the modes, for example, a higher disutility of standing on a bus versus on a tram. These mode-specific estimates can be used as policy values for a given tram line or metro line. Nevertheless, we also pooled the data suggesting average WTP estimates for sitting and crowding reductions that can be used for national cost benefit analysis policy in all large urban areas in Sweden where crowding on local public transport occurs. Importantly, analysis of heterogeneity and SP-design differences shows that the results are in line with empirical knowledge of the value of travel time savings.
机译:这项研究估算了舒适度的政策价值,定义为就座,并减少了瑞典当地公共交通上的拥挤情况。我们使用陈述偏好(SP)数据,并在向受访者展示的图像中描述的站立旅行者中,将拥挤作为中性拥挤水平呈现出来。我们分析了瑞典三个最大的城市地区在舒适和减少拥挤方面的支付意愿(WTP)是否存在差异。总体而言,我们发现三个城市地区在减少坐拥拥挤方面没有明显不同的偏好。尽管如此,点估计在某些情况下仍存在差异,这表明三个城市区域之间可能存在差异,但估计的置信区间彼此重叠。同样,这些差异很可能是由模式份额差异引起的,而不是由城市地区的偏好差异引起的。在这些模式之间发现了一些显着差异,例如,站在公交车上而不是在电车上的无效性更高。这些特定于模式的估算值可以用作给定电车线或地铁线的政策值。尽管如此,我们还汇总了数据,这些数据表明就坐位和拥挤情况而得出的平均WTP估算值可用于瑞典所有大城市中发生拥挤的当地公共交通的国家成本效益分析政策。重要的是,对异质性和SP设计差异的分析表明,结果与节省旅行时间的价值的经验知识一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号